Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Biraj 15 asked in News & EventsCurrent Events · 1 decade ago

There's nuclear conflict between America and Iran, what's the solution ?

12 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    The Iranians should take the incentive package the Other countries offered. It's not only a US problem but a global problem with Iran. The media is just making it look like its just between us and Iran. Iran is destabilizing the whole region and its going to take some intervention and most probably militarily which I know we all hate the concept. It's reality though. I'm in the Navy and even though our Army may be fighting 2 fronts, the Navy is ready and can easily take Iran out with 2 carrier groups. It happened in the 80's when we took their Navy and Air force out in a week. Enough said.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    How badly you phrased that!!

    There is no nuclear conflict - that would mean they were using nukes against each other - I have not seen any reports of mass deaths so you must be wrong!!!

    There is conflict over Iran's desire for a nuclear weapon however!!

    Iran is the first country in the world to come close to getting a nuclear weapon and be very likely to use it. They have stated their intention to wipe Israel of the map and named America as well.

    They are considered highly likely to use the weapon even if it means massive retaliation would wipe them out!!!

    Do you want to wait for millions to die?!!!!!

    The solution is either they clearly demonstrate they have not been making the bomb and allow complete inspection of all their nuclear facilities or they get bombed before they get the chance to use it!!!

    Millions of deaths is far to high a price to pay for dilly dallying about it!!!!

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Well, maybe you should be asking why we agree that Pakistan should be allowed nukes. Shouldn't we be throwing an embargo over Pakistan for its proliferation of nuclear weapons. Their devices are upgraded all the time. According to some American press Pakistan has developed very small suitcase nukes.

    Iran has developed none and claims, as most countries do, to be developing peaceful nuclear programs.

    Oh, dear! I forgot! Iran has lots and lots of oil and sites right beside Iraq!!!!!

    I checked on J W. He doesn't accept email responses so he must be Republican!

  • 1 decade ago

    Drop the insistance on the cessation of all fuel processing before negotiation.

    Publically admit that Iran has a right and a need to develop peaceful nuclear power plants.

    Insist upon safeguards to ensure the fuel rods aren't weaponized.

    Privately threaten them, but publically be silent.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • ?
    Lv 4
    5 years ago

    Bush has blown it enormous on Iran in the event that they somewhat need nuclear capability for peacful purposes. we are in a position to help them with that, and by making use of the way there is going to be a super earthquake to strike Iran in the subsequent 4 years, in the event that they have working nuclear flowers it is going to be devestating. we've the technologies to help them with that. yet newflash, no longer what all of us desires to pay attention, yet they do no longer pick peacful nuclear capability. they simply have 70 million electorate, and that they set on the biggest oil deric interior the worldwide. they have not any prefer for nuclear capability. they are, i believe nervous of us of a. we've helped them in some respects by making use of eleminating 2 classic enemies on their boarders; the taliban, and Saddam. yet now we are there, and that scares them much greater. the 2d undertaking to international family members is that no promise they make is one which would be depended on. Your state of affairs might play out in a ideal worldwide, yet all of us understand the worldwide isn't ideal. Iran is administered by making use of radical extremely theist who join the main somewhat perverted variety of an estiological faith referred to as Islam, and believe this is their divine repsonsiblity to convey forth an apocalyptic end of days. they pick a worldwide war 3. they have declared on 3 seperate activities over the final 365 days that one member state of the U.N. (Israel) could be bodily wiped off the map with all its human beings. they have proofably lied to the ecu Union approximately their nuclear software, they fund Hezbollah upward to the toon of one hundred million money a 365 days, and the President of that u . s . says that he believe the messiah is coming back. they have brokers in North Korea for his or her missile and nuclear attempt, and the only request us of a has positioned on Iran for one on one talks is they supply up enriching uranium, yet they do no longer. Newsflash returned; this has no longer something to do with the introduction of palestinian state. Palestians are taught from young ones that jews and christians are canines, and prophet killers, and can be killed. So no count what's performed as long as racism is being taught, there'll nonetheless be issues. Iran does pick a war, the question is- how envolved will Europe be in a war if one starts? easily, have been probable going to be sure limited strikes on their nuclear centers, yet no longer an all out war.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    There's conflict over nukes but if there were nuclear conflict we probably wouldn't be talking about it.

    The solution is for the US to stop lying to its people and to the rest of the world, and stop playing its role as the worst international criminal nation. It is no coincidence that the self-proclaimed champions of freedom and justice refuse to accept the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice or the International Criminal Court.

    Who gave Israel nuclear weapons while signatories of the nuclear non-proliferation pact?

    Who refused to sign up to a UN proposal that all fissile material should come under international control to which Iran agreed?

  • 1 decade ago

    The solution the american made it negative to iran and may be other muslims countries.In my opinion ,its ok what americans did, coz mericans aint trust them.this is the main reason.And well,they even expect peace in soecity..which have ta develop by many countries...I hope this is the reason behind rejecting the deal.....

    viky thanks question.....

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    The Iranians should just give up.I mean in perspective,we'd win eventually.The best they could do is nuke Israel(but they won't nuke Jerusalem it's holy to them) and our bases and then what?We and Israel turn all of Iran into nuclear desert.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    The Iranians should just give it up. They haven't been a powerfull nation in a thousand years. And they are lucky we didn't nuke em till they glowed back in the '80's

  • 1 decade ago

    USA should stop acting like a bully, stop dictating terms to other countries and try minding her own business.

    how desperate and greedy she would go for oil?!

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.