Obama antichrist unbiased websites?

This is hilarious, and I am almost -- almost -- tempted to think this is some kind of really deep satire. But, sadly, I'm afraid you are entirely serious.

You actually have the gall to call people "retarded" because they are trying to tell you that you cannot have an "unbiased" website that deals seriously with a subject as ridiculous as "the Anti-Christ." As someone else already suggested, any website that purports to deal seriously with the concept of whether or not Obama "could be" the Anti-Christ is already biased in favor of the notion that such an obviously fabulous being could even exist.

When you consider the number of people over the last two thousand years who have been "identified" as the Anti-Christ, from Nero to Napoleon to Hitler to Ronald Reagan, for Pete's sake (no, I'm not making this up), it should be clear to you that there simply is no way to "objectively" deal with such a subject. The descriptions in the Bible of the Anti-Christ are few and extremely vague, and are open to innumerable interpretations. You can, of course, discuss the subject from within the context of belief, but that is absolutely no different than discussing whether Snape was good or bad in the Harry Potter series.

Yes, yes, I know . . . there are millions of people who believe fervently that the Anti-Christ has made, or will make, an appearance, but there are also millions of people who believe that statues of the Hindu god Ganesh have actually drunk milk fed to them by believers (in 1996 and 2005; look it up). Would you call a website that dealt seriously with whether or not that "really" occurred unbiased? I think not.

Have you done a Google search? I just got over a million hits for websites discussing Obama as the AntiChrist. I haven't read them to know which sites are posted by lunatics and which are posted by thoughtful people who truly want to see if Biblical prophecy could be fulfilled in Barack Obama.

You'll also need to identify your own definition of "antichrist." Do you believe there will be one individual who will attempt to rule the entire world shortly before the end of this world? Or do you believe that "antichrist" simply means any person who does not confess Jesus as their savior? You'll have to decide which "antichrist" you want to research before you go jumping into web sites.

http://www.barackobamaantichrist.blogspot.com/

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/antichrist.as...

http://o.bamapost.com/

http://www.topix.com/forum/state/ok/T6LC6ESI3S0DET...

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=92...

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=71144

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/08...

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message48...

http://rffm.typepad.com/republicans_for_fair_medi/...

Are you familiar with the word oxymoron? Using the word unbiased and calling someone the antichrist in the same sentence is an oxymoron.

your question negates the proposition. Any website that calls anyone the antichrist is not unbiased.

First of all the Anti-Christ is coming out of the Old Roman Empire. That would make him White! Obama does not fit that bill.

McCain however may !

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beast_(Bible)

look, first of all obama is not an antichrist, mohammed (i apologize if i spelt it wrong), the messiah, buddha, whatever you want to call it. he is an american just like everyone. no such websites exist, because obviously they are radical! see, think about it, what kind of person or group of people would call an american "antichrist?" see my point?

cain was the first antichrist and slew the first christ able but cain had a son and in scot irish his name is McCain,. but you elected an antichrist before here is the link,