Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Ali ™ asked in Politics & GovernmentGovernment · 1 decade ago

9/11 nothing but a US Government Conspiracy?

I mean think about it- ever since the destruction of World Trade Center there has been nothing but war- Iraq and Afghanistan have become the subject of filth. I blame US Goverment.

15 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Absolutely...Our government is most likely the cause ( with planning ), for the twin towers demise. Bush junior was retaliating for what Bush senior should have completed during his term ( at least as far as mr. and mr. Bush believe ). and what a shame it really is. I believe it was president Eisenhower who said in a speach that " I fear for my future ancestors if the government of the United States of America runs the people rather than the people running the government " and look around america...it has happened . The government pre- occupies the american people by giving them things to quarrel about like gay marriage and things of this sort so that the american people are pre-occupied and dont notice what the government is up to. We as a nation need to stand up TOGETHER and tell the government what it is they ARE going to do and not just accept what the government says. Russia has proven that communism doesnt work, yet our country is leaning that direction with loss of rights every day. WAKE UP AMERICA and stand united for our rights to run this country and not just lay back and accept what the government says and does as not approachable,,,I too fear for my future ancestors...how about YOU.

  • 1 decade ago

    Jews were on holiday when the thing happened, air force could have stopped it, they heard explosion second before the plane hit, all these if true make the conspiracy theory a likely. But why? What is the gain, who will gain.?

    The head count now is that more US soldiers died as a result of IED than people died due to the plane colliding the buildings. It caused US in debt. They losing in Afganistan. Pakistan army start firing the US army chasing the Mujahideen in Pakistan. Japan want to pull out so are the other country army. US army no longer belief in fighting the illegal war. They start calling president was cheating with WEAPON OF MASS destruction. Mujahideen keep fighting even with man carrying bomber, even woman start to volunteer. People finding is that they were more happy under Sadam than under the occupation. Iraq president want US out but US want to stay longer . People start to think of oil is the back of the mind of the US government.

  • ?
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    Certainly yes. When 9/11 happened was there a police inquiry ? But without that they announced the names of the 19 hijackers and announced war against Afghanistan. Many of these hijackers are still living ! Out of 4 affected aircrafts, black box of even a single one was not found ! The plane supposed to have hit the pentagon evaporated !

    All lies. US Govt. is deeply involved in the crime. Criminals are running USA.

  • 1 decade ago

    well your not alone. i personally blame the two parties in the government the democrats and the republicans.

    how ever on the matter of al-quieda to be clear:

    al-quidea attacks on america(chronological)

    1. Mogadishu , somalia 1993

    2. the world trade centers NYC 1993

    3.oklahoma city 1995(the judge suppresed attorneys avffidavit of information on a radical foriegn finacier)

    4.3 americans killed in the philippines by thier al-quida chapter 1998

    5. the embassy bomings in kenya and tanzina 1998

    6. the Uss Cole 2000

    7. 9-11

    oh sure Iraq distracted them awhile but thats about it

    yes revainsh: be proud of your country as hurls tward implosion . good idea!

    Source(s): the southern district court of new york al-quieda enditment 1998
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Did they know about it? Did they DO it? Was it a controlled demolition?

    Did the Pentagon ever suffer any damage?

    You know. The most frightening thing about this to me has been that I would not find it difficult to believe any or all of the above "conspiracy theories". They have shown themselves capable of bestiality in Iraq and Afghanistan. In Abu Grahib and Guantanamo Bay.

    What would they NOT be capable of? is the question I have been asking myself for years.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    If you study the USS Liberty incident, you will realize that the U.S. government may have been only one of the conspirators that planned and carried out the 9/11 and anthrax attacks. Sinking the USS Liberty by Israeli air force was supposed to give America an excuse to attack Egypt. The ship took too long to sink, and the false flag operation had to be canceled. So, Israel apologized for the incident, and that was that, "nothing to see here, move along citizens, move along!"

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    40. The omission of Coleen Rowley's claim that some officials at FBI headquarters did see the memo from Phoenix agent Kenneth Williams (89-90).

    41. The omission of Chicago FBI agent Robert Wright's charge that FBI headquarters closed his case on a terrorist cell, then used intimidation to prevent him from publishing a book reporting his experiences (91).

    42. The omission of evidence that FBI headquarters sabotaged the attempt by Coleen Rowley and other Minneapolis agents to obtain a warrant to search Zacarias Moussaoui's computer (91-94).

    43. The omission of the 3.5 hours of testimony to the Commission by former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds—-testimony that, according to her later public letter to Chairman Kean, revealed serious 9/11-related cover-ups by officials at FBI headquarters (94-101).

    44. The omission of the fact that General Mahmoud Ahmad, the head of Pakistan's intelligence agency (the ISI), was in Washington the week prior to 9/11, meeting with CIA chief George Tenet and other US officials (103-04).

    45. The omission of evidence that ISI chief Ahmad had ordered $100,000 to be sent to Mohamed Atta prior to 9/11 (104-07).

    46. The Commission's claim that it found no evidence that any foreign government, including Pakistan, had provided funding for the al-Qaeda operatives (106).

    47. The omission of the report that the Bush administration pressured Pakistan to dismiss Ahmad as ISI chief after the appearance of the story that he had ordered ISI money sent to Atta (107-09).

    48. The omission of evidence that the ISI (and not merely al-Qaeda) was behind the assassination of Ahmad Shah Masood (the leader of Afghanistan's Northern Alliance), which occurred just after the week-long meeting between the heads of the CIA and the ISI (110-112).

    49. The omission of evidence of ISI involvement in the kidnapping and murder of Wall Street Reporter Daniel Pearl (113).

    50. The omission of Gerald Posner's report that Abu Zubaydah claimed that a Pakistani military officer, Mushaf Ali Mir, was closely connected to both the ISI and al-Qaeda and had advance knowledge of the 9/11 attacks (114).

    51. The omission of the 1999 prediction by ISI agent Rajaa Gulum Abbas that the Twin Towers would be "coming down" (114).

    52. The omission of the fact that President Bush and other members of his administration repeatedly spoke of the 9/11 attacks as "opportunities" (116-17).

    53. The omission of the fact that The Project for the New American Century, many members of which became key figures in the Bush administration, published a document in 2000 saying that "a new Pearl Harbor" would aid its goal of obtaining funding for a rapid technological transformation of the US military (117-18).

    54. The omission of the fact that Donald Rumsfeld, who as head of the commission on the US Space Command had recommended increased funding for it, used the attacks of 9/11 on that very evening to secure such funding (119-22).

    55. The failure to mention the fact that three of the men who presided over the failure to prevent the 9/11 attacks—-Secretary Rumsfeld, General Richard Myers, and General Ralph Eberhart---were also three of the strongest advocates for the US Space Command (122).

    56. The omission of the fact that Unocal had declared that the Taliban could not provide adequate security for it to go ahead with its oil-and-gas pipeline from the Caspian region through Afghanistan and Pakistan (122-25).

    57. The omission of the report that at a meeting in July 2001, US representatives said that because the Taliban refused to agree to a US proposal that would allow the pipeline project to go forward, a war against them would begin by October (125-26).

    58. The omission of the fact that Zbigniew Brzezinski in his 1997 book had said that for the United States to maintain global primacy, it needed to gain control of Central Asia, with its vast petroleum reserves, and that a new Pearl Harbor would be helpful in getting the US public to support this imperial effort (127-28).

    59. The omission of evidence that some key members of the Bush administration, including Donald Rumsfeld and his deputy Paul Wolfowitz, had been agitating for a war with Iraq for many years (129-33).

    60. The omission of notes of Rumsfeld's conversations on 9/11 showing that he was determined to use the attacks as a pretext for a war with Iraq (131-32).

    Source(s): 61. The omission of the statement by the Project for the New American Century that "the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein" (133-34). 62. The claim that FAA protocol on 9/11 required the time-consuming process of going through several steps in the chain of command--even though the Report cites evidence to the contrary (158). 63. The claim that in those days there were only two air force bases in NORAD's Northeast sector that kept fighters on alert and that, in particular, there were no fighters on alert at either McGuire or Andrews (159-162). 64. The omission of evidence that Andrews Air Force Base did keep several fighters on alert at all times (162-64). 65. The acceptance of the twofold claim that Colonel Marr of NEADS had to telephone a superior to get permission to have fighters scrambled from Otis and that this call required eight minutes (165-66). 66. The endorsement of the claim that the loss of an airplane's transponder signal makes it virtually impossible for the US military's radar to track that plane (166-67). 67. The claim that the Payne Stewart interception did not show NORAD's response time to Flight 11 to be extraordinarily slow (167-69). 68. The claim that the Otis fighters were not airborne until seven minutes after they received the scramble order because they did not know where to go (174-75). 69. The claim that the US military did not know about the hijacking of Flight 175 until 9:03, when it was crashing into the South Tower (181-82). 70. The omission of any explanation of (a) why NORAD's earlier report, according to which the FAA had notified the military about the hijacking of Flight 175 at 8:43, was now to be considered false and (b) how this report, if it was false, could have been published and then left uncorrected for almost three years (182). 71. The claim that the FAA did not set up a teleconference until 9:20 that morning (183). 72. The omission of the fact that a memo by Laura Brown of the FAA says that its teleconference was established at about 8:50 and that it included discussion of Flight 175's hijacking (183-84, 186). 73. The claim that the NMCC teleconference did not begin until 9:29 (186-88). 74. The omission, in the Commission's claim that Flight 77 did not deviate from its course until 8:54, of the fact that earlier reports had said 8:46 (189-90). 75. The failure to mention that the report that a large jet had crashed in Kentucky, at about the time Flight 77 disappeared from FAA radar, was taken seriously enough by the heads of the FAA and the FBI's counterterrorism unit to be relayed to the White House (190). 76. The claim that Flight 77 flew almost 40 minutes through American airspace towards Washington without being detected by the military's radar (191-92). 77. The failure to explain, if NORAD's earlier report that it was notified about Flight 77 at 9:24 was "incorrect," how this erroneous report could have arisen, i.e., whether NORAD officials had been lying or simply confused for almost three years (192-93). 78. The claim that the Langley fighter jets, which NORAD had previously said were scrambled to intercept Flight 77, were actually scrambled in response to an erroneous report from an (unidentified) FAA controller at 9:21 that Flight 11 was still up and was headed towards Washington (193-99). 79. The claim that the military did not hear from the FAA about the probable hijacking of Flight 77 before the Pentagon was struck (204-12). 80. The claim that Jane Garvey did not join Richard Clarke's videoconference until 9:40, after the Pentagon was struck (210).
  • 1 decade ago

    Yes for sure. Clinton set it up to embarrass Bush.

  • 1 decade ago

    I doubt it but they sure have used it for their evil plan to rid Iraq of it's oil.Also if two people know a secret,the only way it will stay a secret is if one of them is dead.

  • 1 decade ago

    YO go and rent the movie loose change.

    you can see explosions going off in the WTC like a demo crew took it down.

    Makes you wonder

    Source(s): nice guy
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.