Will George W Bush and his administration be held accountable for?

They should. But in this country you only go to jail if you steal below the $1 million threshold.

More than that they make you president

guy, you Democratic liberals will bypass to any length, in the past back sixty one years or perhaps then get the historic past incorrect. the two FDR and Truman have been in touch with in simple terms one conflict...WWII. And in case you prefer to be precise, some thing historians like....President Truman develop into the sitting President and he gets each and every of the credit. in simple terms such as you're blaming President Bush ....and as he's the sitting President blame is going with the activity. And once you're a huge proponent for attacking dropping President ensure you place maximum folk of our lack of ability to win Viet Nam at JFK's door step. He and then Democratic LBJ larger US troop presence there from 15,000 to over 500,000 with fifty 8,000 ineffective. And Nixon; a Republican ultimately pulled us out of the conflict. in case you prefer to cite historic past to make political assaults...you could desire to resreach your historic past and comprehend that historic past can be used for occasion how susceptible your fact in simple terms would be.

even more than that he should be tried for treason for his actions on 9-11. He made it look like he was an all protective President But that is a devious cover up. Our Air Force was ordered to stand down. We had the capabilities to shoot down the very air liners that would demolish the twin towers. Everyone knows the news in our country is filtered and we only hear half the story. In October of 2003 Radio Canada published their version of what happened on 9-11 and it shows that Bush is no hero. Even his father was involved. He had lunch with Bin Ladens brother. After 9-11 when no commercial air craft was supposed to fly Bin Ladens family was flown out of the country to Afghanistan on Bush's orders. 15 of the 19 people responsible were of Saudi descent and quite possibly Saudi Arabia was responsible and not Afghanistan and we invaded this nation that basically brought down the old Soviet Union back in the 1980s. Saudi Arabia has not even been put on the list of nations that sponsor terrorism by Bush yet the things that nation do makes you wonder if they really belong there. If Bush were in fact an agent for a foreign power he has done a master job. He has ruined our economy. Our military is in no condition to fight. The entire world is against us for one reason or another. I am not saying that Bush is an agent of another country mainly because i don't want this answer deleted but i am asking what if?

Well, so far Bush and his cronies have gotten away with everything, and noone, including Congress has done anything at all to stop them.

"Waterboarding?" If that's not torture, then let's do it to the ones who advocate this and see how THEY like it!!

How about investingating Haliburton and how many billions they've been paid and what for, and their ties to the administration?

No, it looks like they will get away with everything, and now they're planning the biggest "legalized" theft of all time----- $ 700,000,000,000 to the failed fatcats on Wall Street. It's apparent that the ones who are favored by the administration will be at the head of the line and get the lion's share. Giving money to incompetent executives so that they can stay in their multi-million-dollar houses, and in their multi-million-dollar jobs, with their multi-million-dollar bonuses?

Yeah, right. Let's give the money to those who are TAKING the houses with tax dollars extorted from those who are LOSING their houses! Typical government---take from the poor and give to the rich.

Only if we can hold you accountable for the same offenses.

You have to admit that they are just a guilty as you are!

No, they are non existent. I agree with Jeff Smoker.

Mainly President Bush and Cheney, should be thankful that they are not tried as war criminals and impeached. They could be charged.

Nice try but please stop with the talking points of the Democrats.

NO he should not!

Was LBJ?

The answer is no.

No because none exist. Take your hater-aide to someone who cares to hear such rubbish.