Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Why should older drivers not have to be tested?
I am writing a paper for my political science class on the topic of testing for older drivers and the rough draft/outline is due tomorrow. I already have 14 pages on why their should be increased testing for elderly drivers from an older paper. This essay only needs to be 5-7 pages long, so I just need some stuff from the other side of the argument.
6 Answers
- Vince MLv 71 decade agoFavorite Answer
I think they should. But not just older drivers. In my opinion, YOUNGER drivers should be tested annually for the first few years of driving. These are the ones who have statistically demonstrated the highest collision, fatality and citation rates.
Then, every one else should be tested pretty often, perhaps every five years or so, and even mor often for those who get certain moving violation citations.
Elderly drivers, in particular, should not be single out for retesting more often than others. I think a driving record should determine how often someone should be retested.
Source(s): Certified Instructor, National Safety Council Defensive Driving Course 4 - lafortuneLv 45 years ago
i think of each driving force could be retested each 5 years. youthful drivers (under 40) could be retested on the regulations of the line. Older drivers could a minimum of have their imaginative and prescient and reaaction cases examined. of course, this may well be high priced and not politically sound. you already know, the great value-reward diagnosis. There are drivers available of each age who actually do no longer understand the regulations of the line. which includes what the painted highway markings mean, who has the proper-of-way at intersections or what the indications mean. i'm available on a daily basis at rush hour interior the AM and PM and that is frightening what those drivers do no longer understand. And there are not many sixty 3-80 3 365 days old drivers available at that element. the backside twist of destiny costs (below 15 per a million million miles pushed) are from the a protracted time of 31 to 70. Over the age of 80 one is with reference to the comparable yet nevertheless below the sixteen-20 age group. extra or less 23 injuries per a million million miles for the oldest age group, to extra or less 26 injuries per a million million miles pushed for the youngest age group.
- thud.fanLv 61 decade ago
Right now, the big objection to testing older drivers is age discrimination. Yet driving doesn't discriminate against who gets killed or maimed. Operating a motor vehicle today is almost comparable to flying an airplane and in some ways is more complex. Airplane drivers must be tested periodically - at least in a simulator - to maintain their proficiency and currency for flying the airplane they are rated in. This testing makes sure that the pilots don't develop bad habits, which can be fatal. Most vehicle operators are road tested only once in their lifetime. Many of us have developed bad habits and many of us are dead - over 30,000 a year - or ruined - over 2 million a year. Do you see a correlation here?
Source(s): former driver safety examiner former professional driver driver safety consultant - KiloLv 41 decade ago
I think you may want to look at this website
Drivers in 50 to 64 age group have the fewest accidents
Drivers younger than the 50 have by far the most accidents. With the 18-25 yr olds having the most accidents
http://www.casact.org/pubs/proceed/proceed51/51073...
So lets see its the younger drivers who have the highest number of fatal accidents , and it's the younger drivers who have the majority of accidents
So lets test the safest group of drivers on our roads to see if they are capable of operating a motor vehicle
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Yes but all people of all ages should be retested every year........
Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death among 15- to 20-year olds.
According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, 3,490 drivers in this age group died in motor vehicle crashes in 2006 and an additional 272,000 were injured.
Drivers age 15- to 20-years old accounted for 12.9 percent of all the drivers involved in fatal crashes and 16 percent of all the drivers involved in police-reported crashes.
Twenty-five percent of teen drivers killed were intoxicated. In 2006 (latest data available) crashes involving 15 to 17 year olds cost more than $34 billion nationwide, in medical costs, property damage and other costs, according to an AAA analysis.
Among licensed drivers, young people between the ages of 15 and 20 have the highest rate of fatal crashes relative to other age groups, including the elderly.
In fact, the risk of being involved in a fatal crash for teens is three times greater than for drivers age 65 to 69.
Immaturity and lack of driving experience are the two main factors leading to the high crash rate among teens...
Source(s): 316 - 1 decade ago
I believe they should get tested because I got hit by a older lady on the second day of school and that wasn't a pleasant sight to see.