Obama suporters, how do you explain this latest incident?

Isn't it interesting that apparently EVERY associate of Obama's since he was 12 years old and returned to Hawaii to get an American education who has been exposed by the media has either been someone with a socialist bent (Ayers, Wright, Farakkhan) or those who apparently hate America, and/or white people, and Israel (Ayers, Wright, Farakkhan, Jackson, Odinga, Davis, his wife,, now Khalidi)?

Obama has had to constantly distance himself from these characters (except Michelle) and has constantly had to state that he doesn't necessarily agree with them and that they are not his advisers or have a part in directing his foreign policy, but I have yet to hear him say that they never will in the future be his advisor or have a part in determining his foreign policy.

Simply put, I don't trust him. He is too vague on too many issues and he, like EVERY politician will say anything to anyone if they think it will help influence their vote.

i don't be attentive to which particular vote you're speaking approximately. All costs and resolutions commonly contain many votes at somewhat some ranges. If some thing feels like it is going to bypass or be defeated by ability of an excellent margin, many don't difficulty to fly around the country to vote on it using fact this is not appropriate. previous that, i think of you will be able to correctly be refering to a non-binding decision which somewhat grew to become into only political posturing and had no tooth to it besides. yet previous that, there's a huge concern with asserting the Iranian guard to be a 17 November. The respected definition of "terrorist" utilized by ability of the U. S. State branch excludes any governmental organisation and basically considers communities that are exterior of any respected government. there's a cynical reason of that. Any definition used to declare a remote places governmental organisation to be "terrorists" must be used to outline the CIA or perhaps the U. S. militia as a 17 November. i individually undertaking all people to outline terrorist in the form of way that doesn't incorporate the U. S..

This is much to do about NOTHING yet again.

I guess you didn't read the article did you?

"In the article -- based on the videotape obtained by the Times -- Wallsten said Obama addressed an audience during a 2003 farewell dinner for Khalidi, who was Obama's colleague at the University of Chicago, before his departure for Columbia University in New York."

This man was a CO-WORKER of Obama at UC when Obama was an instructor there!!

First your link is from fox news, a station known for false advertising on obama. Now if this was on c-span, the only station without an agenda, I would pay attention, but we are talking FOX NEWS a conservatives haven. It is not a real news network to me.

McCain gave money to that guy so Obama thought it was ok.

Fox is part of the mainstream media.

Elitist celebrity muslim terrorist socialist baby killer for president!

Obama doesn't give explanations - only excuses and diversions.