Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Sentinel asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 1 decade ago

Why are Liberal Socialist Democrats unable to disagree with Others without using Valgar Language or Worse?

Lately, it is becoming evident that the Obama Supporters are acting like Hitler's Brown shirts, who put Hitler in charge of Germany in the late 1930s. They attack All who disagreed with them with Racist, Sexual, Sexist, and Hateful means.

When all else failed, the Followers of Hitler resorted to Physical Terror, Killings, and Death camps.

I do not like what I am seeing and hearing from these Obama Supporters. I wonder if there are Other Reasonable People who also see this Danger Growing.

Update 2:

I am sorry for this mistake in typing. The Word that you noticed is correctly spelled "Vulgar". It means, "Offensive in manner or Language".

I hope that this meets with your approval!

Update 4:

Bob G. How can you compare the Education of Obama and McCain, when All of Obama's College information is sealed or unavailable?

13 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Maybe this is why Obama wants to start up a Civilian Security Force

    or a Civilian National Gurad? sounds like the SA BROWN SHIRTS TO me..Obama loves FDR and his socialistic plans and sadly Hilary Clinton and Bill Clinton do to..this is raw socialism and with any form

    of ISM the American's will be torn apart?

  • 1 decade ago

    The only vulgar word I have used in support of Obama and in attacking McCain was the word you find in the middle of the phrase "magna *** laude". In the context of that phrase, it is hardly vulgar, but Y!A automatically assumes otherwise.

    The point I was making related to the different approaches both candidates took in regard to their education. Obama graduated near the very top of his class at Harvard Law, and McCain graduated near the very bottom of his class at the U.S. Naval Academy (894 of 899).

    I hope you can agree that I'm not being vulgar here. I also hope you can agree that comparing their educational backgrounds is an important and valid approach to comparing the candidates.

    Edit:

    Below is a link to a completely biased conservative website that claims several of Obama's records are sealed. I'm using this source because you might be likely to accept it. It states that Obama graduated magna *** laude from Harvard Law. His records must not be completely sealed if his graduation status is included and not disputed.

    You may want to question (or expose?) Obama supporters and Obama himself about his sealed records and his time at Harvard, but consider for a moment that neither candidate is making educational background an important campaign issue. If either were to do so, it would give Obama another plus--graduating 894th out of 899 is rock-bottom. If anything, Obama is giving McCain a free pass on this issue.

    How can we really trust McCain's ability to make decisions as Commander-in-Chief when he barely graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy?

  • 1 decade ago

    Oh, gee, you're right! We've been acting JUST like the Nazis! Who knew a Q&A site could have so much power! Don't hate me Mr. Neocon!!

    I'm changing my Nazi ways - I will no longer attack all who disagree with me, I'll be an even-handed, rational neocon who never attacks anyone and who never says anything racist or sexist or hateful.

    All of the death camps in history have OBVIOUSLY been run by Liberals. How could I never see this before! Neocons would never resort to physical terror or killings! Oh, except people they disagree with, like blacks and Jews and American citizens of Middle-Eastern descent who were stupid enough to go home to visit sick relatives. I mean, of COURSE we have to put "those people" in Guantanamo and torture them for three years before we figure out they're innocent! This is AMURICA! We can't take the risk!!! It's ok because when Neocons do it, it's PATRIOTIC!

    Damn those irrational Obama supporters! I'm going to be a REASONABLE neocon from now on!

  • ?
    Lv 4
    5 years ago

    Acid, be ordinary, if she replace into unlikely to run in 2016, could you additionally be posting the question? Now, if the respond is confident, then please tell me why the fifty 4 assaults on our embassies for the duration of the Bush administration, wherein 11 human beings died, have been by no potential given an analogous style of scrutiny via individuals of your ideological ilk? Did you %. away that part of your judgment of right and incorrect interior an analogous place the place individuals like your self by no potential afflicted to respond to or clarify the place those WMDs in Iraq have been placed? i presumed mendacity replace into considered a sin to you human beings, or has Mark Sanford cured you of that requirement?

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    You just use vulgar language toward the democrats. You call them " socialist "because you have been schooled by the McCain campaign. Maybe for the next two days, you will have enough time to call the democrats "communists "

    Unfortunately, those tactics of fear have been placed on you and you bought them.

  • 1 decade ago

    Most of the vulgar language and the disparaging language is coming from the anti-Obama forces. Trying to turn it around on the Democrats and Obama supporters is a form of projection or just plain deliberate lying propaganda.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Valgar? Whassat?

    Just to edumacate you a little bit, Hitler's fascism falls to the right of the political spectrum, kind of like McCain supporters deciding who is a "real" American (oooh, not the Liiibbraals!), and who are terrorists (ooooh, liibbraals are American hating terrorist lovers, and even terrorists themselves!), are who are communists (ooooh, liiibraals are commies, I'm scared!)....all the while not even understanding what those concepts mean thanks to the obvious failure of the American education system, or too much inbreeding.

    Edit: Thanks for the clarification. Yes, it does meet with my approval now, and I'll let it go...this time! ;)

  • Leo
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    Gibberish.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    because most GOPers lack a 12-grade education.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Pot calling the Kettle black.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.