If McCain's name had been Abolf, would democrats have been deriding him for his name ?

No because democrats don't feel the need to find a reason to belittle McCain. The campaign speaks for itself.

Is this truly a serious question?

If I had a dollar for every time I've heard Bush refereed to as Hitler or as a Nazi, I'd be a rich man.

We're just playing by the rules your team established 8 years ago.

If his name was Abolf, he had belonged to a racist church for 20 years, & was friends with Ayers, etc. he wouldn't have even made it past the primaries. Obama's name isn't the point. It just an interesting addition to his already questionable character.

the reason you should vote against obama is because he believes in murdering babies, he is against off shore drilling, he inexperienced, he will institute a socialized national health care plan, he wants to take away our gun ownership rights, he voted against making english our official language, he supports giving social security benefits to illegals, he WILL RAISE EVERYONE'S TAXES!

IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HIS NAME!!

It's Adolf. You got the "b" backwards, just like that girl who carved a B into her face. There's a pattern here.

I don't care what their names are, if they were Susie Cherry and Sally Diapers -- it's what they STAND FOR, their character, their associations.

Ain't the name, toon, its the game: http://theobamafile.com/

if the democrats would of been down in the polls,yes they would.

No.

Nice strawman.

You mean Adolf surely?