Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
29 Answers
- kroLv 61 decade agoFavorite Answer
Both.
The only people who should have the legal right to abortion should be:
Women who were victims of rape. Some people say the woman can give it up for adoption but there is a lot more to it than that when it's rape. No women should have to suffer for 9 months with a constant reminder of being raped, it would be like letting the rapist brand her for 9 months.
Or where health issues are a concern. That includes any potentially dealy scenario the Mother or an unhealthy baby. I would include retardation or any other issues that a mother may not be able to deal with.
Anytime you have sex, even protected you need to be ready to deal with the possiblity of getting pregnant. If you are not willing to have a baby if you get pregnant then don't have sex.
- 1 decade ago
Pro-life but the choice was made before the baby was on the way.
Those who are pro choice have a deeper moral issue going on than killing a baby. One rule must 1st be broken to break the next rule.
1. Thu shalt not commit fornication
2. Thu shalt not commit murder.
Read the lesson of King David.
- xDark_Genomex =)Lv 51 decade ago
I don't agree with abortion ,but I guess there are some good enough reasons, such as a decision between life or death. I also think, the woman should have choice, because it is her body. Other than that, I don't abortion is right. So i guess a little of both. Also, people count rape as a reason. But giving the child up for adoption is an option. It isn't the babies fault, so it shouldn't be killed because of that. The rapist should go hell, but the baby shouldn't suffer
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- 1 decade ago
A little of both depending on the circumstances - laws must have flexibility!
- Strummer's Girl.Lv 61 decade ago
I'm pro-choice. It's up to the women what she wants to do with her body.
Or I guess you could say depends on circumstances, because if it's a teenage whore, or a teenager in general, they need to have to deal with the consequences, which is having the baby.
- 1 decade ago
Pro-choice all the way. It's a woman's body to do with as she wishes. And yes, I'm a Christian but my choices are between me and my God. People try to use their religion as their reason and yes I understand that but they need to think... not everyone believes in the same thing, not everyone believes in my God.
And for miss missy who got raped and still had it, good for you thats nice but my friend chose another option. that doesnt make her a bad person, it was her decision, as it should have been.
Source(s): Mega pro-choice!! - Morbid • Megan™Lv 61 decade ago
little of both depending on the circumstances.
Usually Pro-Life though.
- ROBERT PLv 71 decade ago
Pro-Life. Human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception. From the first moment of his existence, a human being must be recognised as having the rights of a person - among which is the inviolable right of every innocent being to life.