Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Arthur N asked in Arts & HumanitiesPhilosophy · 1 decade ago

Is the purpose of life to feel?

Humans have many and varied emotional states such as love, hate, bitterness, happiness, joy, longing, irritation and jealousy. And whether we like it or not these emotions are always around, colouring everything we do and every situation we are in. In fact any law enforcement officer worth his/her pay will tell you that emotions cloud people’s memory. Fear and anxiety will distort peoples perception of an event causing them to remember things differently, one person may not even be able to tell you if an attacker had feet while another would be able to describe in intricate detail every article of clothing. How many jokes have been born from the classic his and her points of view on a date? The female view may be something along the lines of "Great night, went out to dinner and when we got there ..., etc." while the male point of view may be "Bad night, didn't get any and went to bed early."

The fact is emotions are with us all the time, they effect everything we do, say and think. The single great piece of evidence for this fact is that the human face is capable of creating over 10,000 expressions, why would we have so many possible expressions to choose from if emotions were only a side note to life? Why also are emotions so pervasive and intrusive into our lives if they are simply there as an evolutionary afterthought?

It is therefore my assertion that the purpose of life is to feel, to experience life in all it's many and varied shades and colours. This does not mean that we should let go and wallow in all of the hedonistic pleasures available but simply to enjoy life as it comes our way. We are all endowed with a mind capable of processing our thoughts and feelings and we should use it to place our emotions in context, to allow us to navigate the traitorous waters of life to find safe harbours during the storms. Descarte said "I think therefore I am" I say "I feel therefore I have a reason to be."

So my question is, If feeling and emotion a major part of life or perhaps even the purpose of life? If so why or why not? Please explain your answers if you can.

Serious answers only please.

Thanks.

5 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Seriously, no!

    Source(s): kaci
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Yes I think feeling and emotion are a big part of humans and should remain so. Without compassion, the world would be a worse place. Without impulsiveness and desire, the greatest inventions would not exist. Without anger and sadness for our lost ones, medical research and breakthroughs would not have happened.

    My temperament on the Meyer-Briggs personality test is an NF (intuitive feeler), as opposed to an NT or ST (intuitive thinker or sensing thinker). People with a more dominant "feeling" side maybe be more subjective and compassionate and caring to others but may make factual errors. People with a more dominant thinking side may be less likely to sympathize with other people, and make errors in understanding others' feelings, but make less factual errors.

    I think both feeling and thinking sides of the human are important and people should strive for a balance (although people tend to have a dominant side, perhaps by a combo of upbringing and genetic disposition?). It's my opinion that a "mature mind" should be a more balanced one.

    EDIT: As for whether feeling is the sole purpose of life, that I can't answer. Some people don't think there's any purpose in life :-) But since we're here, we might as well feel and think and do anything we can, because we can.

    NB: A common misconception of the Meyer-Briggs test it that it measures ability. It does not. It measures preference. I am an engineering student, after all (software engineering)

  • 1 decade ago

    It's all about purpose, isn't it? I could say eating, for the same reasons you have enlisted to defend emoting. Or perhaps work? I spend over a fourth of every week working (40 hours X 4 equals 160, a week is 168 hours a week, and I get lots of overtime). An Eskimo would suggest Snow as a purpose of existence, eh? The Eskimo language has over 200 words for Snow. It is obviously a very pervasive part of their lives--after all, their world is filled with only two other things, Polar Bears and Penguins, maybe a few Salmon here and there. An Ethiopian would say Sand, for the same reason an Eskimo would say Snow. Meanwhile, I think that both the Eskimo would be looking askance at the Ethiopian, and the Ethiopian would be scowling at the Eskimo.

    Source(s): The purpose of life is Ants. Why else would life have blessed my yard with so many of them? It's your spin that I am decrying. It bleeds out of your implied conclusions like a squashed tomato. Where is the logic in saying that the number of possible expressions dictates that its usage is the purpose of life? There are billions of dollars in the economy! That's over nine zeroes. 10,000 has only four. Couldn't I say that Money trumps your single great piece of evidence? Sorry, but my answer is a resounding "Nope" on technicalities.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Really, I understand why you believe your theory, but I can't say I agree with you fully. Although there isn't a human being that was born without emotions, it really isn't the only purpose of life.

    Actually, I believe that everyone's purpose in life is different, and it can vary from things from 'giving life to a child, who will become in importance to the world' to 'bringing death to someone important, whether it is to improve the world or not'. I'm a rather strange philosopher I suppose... even though I believe in the logical side of life, I also believe in things that shouldn't exist... improbable things like love, esp, gods and goddesses. In doing so I believe that I was told in a dream these meanings, which is why I'm so sure of myself.

    But, in all seriousness, the true purpose of life is to die. Scientifically, our purpose is to die, so our bodies can stay in the circle of life, and to make room for another child.

    I didn't do much detail, I suppose. I might tomorrow though, but I need to go, I have to wake early tomorrow. Goodnight.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I'm with the stoics. No.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.