Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

questions about mongol rule ?

1. all of the following are reasons why sedentary civilizations increasingly dominated nomadic societies after the fifteenth century EXCEPT:

a. black death reduced nomadic populations

b. nomadic populations did not recover as rapidly or completely from the plague as did those sedentary civilizations

c. after about 1400 sedentary civilizations began to centralize their power and better mobilize resources for warfare

d. soldiers of sedentary civilizations proved to be better trained in the art of war than their nomadic counterparts

e. industrialization included technological innovations in warfare that gave advantages to sedentary civilizations

2. what was the most critical of the shifts that allowed sedentary civilizations to dominate nomadic peoples after the 15th century?

a. the technological sophistication of the sedentary civilizations

b. the demographic blow to the nomadic population caused by the black death

c. the expansion of overseas trade to the americas

d. the progressive desiccation of the central asian steppes

e. the tendency of the nomadic peoples to give up their lifestyle in preference for sedentary agriculture

3. how did the territorial extent of the mongol empire affect inter-cultural exchange?

a. the mongol empire linked the great civilizations of the eastern hemisphere including western and eastern euroope, dar al islam, and china and permitted the free exchange of goods and ideas along traditional trade routes

b. the mongol empire, though linking the great civilizations of the eastern hemisphere, actually impeded this exchange of goods and ideas due to the persistence of the war along traditional trade routes

c. there was little disruption or expansion of economic or cultural exchange as a result of the establishment of the mongol empire

d. chinggis khan and his successors were intolerant of other cultures and religions and as a result mongol rule tneded to decrease regional trade and suppress local culture and religion

e. the ongosl only seriously affected economic and cultural exchange in china but had little impact in russia, eastern europe, or throughout the islamic world

3 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    1 A

    2 A

    3 A..

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    1. A.

    2. A.

    3. B.

  • 5 years ago

    asker : " i'm not soliciting for an answer im asking might desire to this be top and a appropriate essay subject count? ============= communist takeover in Russia grew to alter into obtainable precisely because of fact Russia replaced into unfavourable and economically vulnerable u . s . a . in the begining of twentieth century (even Lenin reported that), and ofcource on your budget weak point of Russia (while in comparison with developeed international of those days - u . s . a ., Britain) had distinctive motives in the back of it - Mongol (Tatar-Mongol extra effective to declare as Golden Horde grew to alter into specifically Tatar state via the tip of its rule over Russia as unique Mongol invaders mixed with locals in Kazan Kganate (Golden Horde) or maybe time-honored turkic tatar language) - so as that 3 hundred years of occupation ofcource replaced into one among a number of aspects that formed on your budget and social progression in Russia (even after Russians liberated themselves of Tatar-Mongol yoke) - so which you're top in a fashion- yet there have been ofcource a number of different aspects - financial progression is inspired via commerce and so via CLOSENESS of centres of production to a minimum of one yet another and density of inhabitants - those aspects have been absent in Russia because it replaced into too super and density of inhabitants too low - so without mutual exchanges of products(commerce), each village/city/community in Russia had to offer for each little thing themselves and so no specialisation of production got here approximately for increasing replace and commerce (on an analogous time as in easy terms specialisation of production for commerce boosts sophistication - that project replaced into absent in Russia) , so in Russia concentration of production and commerce in basic terms did not take place /or it (commerce) replaced into minimum...In u . s . a . there too have been super teritories and espresso density, yet people who immigrated to u . s . a . have been already notably industrious as they have been formed in Britain as persons and as a fashion of existence , not replaced into there such distinctive and industrious immigration to Russia the place communities have been remoted and trusted classic techniques of production and social srtucture...yet back, one among motives of underdevelopment replaced into isolation and absence of freedom because of Tatar-Mongol occupation, so which you're top, yet in easy terms in part as there have been additionally different (suggested above) motives for underdevelopment that (underdevelopment) helped commies to takeover in 1917.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.