Isn't this an interesting question...(sarcasm)?

but...i thought adoption was "selfless" and "loving." now (according to some of your posters) fmothers are "abandoners and should pay child support?

but...if the "abandoners" kept their babies or changed their minds, they are then "selfish" and evil...

the circular logic is causing me a bad case of vertigo.

That's just crazy I am pregnent and have to give up my baby because I am only 16 but if I have to pay teh govenmet then I might as well just keep it. Talk about stupid.

And they think their helping by opening their mouths.

We seem to have a new first mother hater. Hi I'm a first mother, I cause lots of pain to myself and my daughter, nice to meet you.

Seriously, you can save your breath trying to hurt me with your words. There is NOTHING you can say that I couldn't top to hurt myself over what I did.

I'm not a victim. I have never claimed to be a victim, I take full responsibility for my actions.

It may sound ridiculous, but it is an interesting question if you think about it.

People who lose their kids to abuse or neglect sould pay support.

Those who use foster care do to illness should not.

OMG outrageaous. How aweful.

That is seriously a real question?

That's ridiculous!

Well actually, I think it is interesting... (no sarcasm).

No. That is silly.

Um, stupid was getting pregnant at sixteen. You should take responsibility for your actions. Absolutely child support should be paid by those who put their child up for adoption. Maybe, they would think a little harder and not take the easy way out and dar I say it, raise their child.