Is it life or potential human life?

"Anything that grows is not dead. Period."

Stalactites grow.

Pigs grow too, but we have no trouble killing them. I don't believe a fetus has any rights. It is not self-conscious, it does not think, it is not a person. It is a simple organic robot which may grow into a human being.

It appears that you love your words so much you have to repeat them. Well, I am going to do the same thing and repeat my answer so that it may help expose you to everyone else.

Well 100% of people die at some point so by following your logic I can kill anyone I want to because they are dead already. I fail to see how you can say that a fetus isn't alive. When something is growing it is alive. It doesn't matter that it needs its mother to grow. No born child could survive alone until they reach a certain age. If a fetus isn't alive then what is it? If it were dead then it would never grow to be what you consider to be a person. When people put their minds to solving a problem it gets solved. It is people like you who prevent the world from acknowledging that there is a problem. You just love to hear yourself speak and will throw meaningless words out over and over again so that people become so fed up with the topic they give up. Do you think that a world without abortions would be bad? If not then why don't you try to reduce them instead of dedicating a lot of time to further a harmful process.

Also, your blog is a joke. It seems like you are trying so hard to be intelligent, but you just fall on your face over and over again. The answer is not to procreate until we all die of starvation. The answer is to get people to realize that abortion is a problem so that we can educate and innovate to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies before they begin. When we solve this problem we also solve the problem of hungry children. Everyone is on the same side, they are just so far entrenched they won't admit it. People come together and solve the problem of unwanted pregnancies, its the solution everyone wants.

You are also missing a huge part of the equation. If a person were not spending money on their "fetus" it doesn't mean that they would use those resources to help a child in need. They would just use it to buy more useless crap. Again, we need to educate people about the problem, not breed hate.

OK lets keep this one fresh and short.

1. Show me the math. I read your blog and other site and see NO mathematical proof. Boil it down and show it to me.

2. A fetus that is already dead obviously doesn't need to be aborted so that is irrelevant. It is easy enough to determine what fetus is alive and what is not. The fetus that is alive will be born. Again, if I follow your logic then I shouldn't have an abortion because most pregnancies will end anyway and the abortion would be a waste of resources. How many starving children that should never have been conceived could that save?

3. Again, you are just strying to start a fight here. Would you like to end unwanted pregnancy? If so then we are on the same page. The fact that our viewpoints on abortion differ is irrelevant. I'm sure a man who so loves math can figure out that it is more effecient to prevent a pregnancy then to have an abortion or give birth. The problem is that people are so obsessed with this idea that it is their right to have an abortion. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't but until you put that aside we cannot solve the problem.

now i am pro choice but i suspect that if you look into it you will find out that abortions are mostly performed on the fertilized eggs that did not abort, ie that caused a bona fide pregnancy which isn't going away.

the 7 of 10 who die mostly do so before a positive pregnancy test and before most abortions occur. i mean your argument sounds good but it's not really true. otherwise 7 of 10 positive pregnancy tests would go away and that just doesn't happen.

I think life starts as soon a s the sperm enters the egg and begins to split and grow. Of course it is potential life, its growing. The law of natural selection decides its fate. Or the vacuum tube does. The womens choice.

Watch a time lapse video of a plant growing from a seed under the soil before sprouting through it. Now, ask yourself, at what point from the time of germination wasn't the plant considered living?

The term fetus describe that part of the process of life growing into a human. Was it dead at any part of that process? If not, why say its not a baby?

Would you abort your pet's kittens or puppies during its pregnancy? Funny how pet lovers find that appalling, but think human abortion isn't.

The reality is that life does not begin at conception, and anyone who thinks that is ignorant.

The sperm and egg are both quite alive. At no point in the reproductive cycle is anything dead.

Potential life. As you've already explained, conception does not guarantee a live birth.

the early stance of the church was that until the fetus could be discerned as male of female, it wasn't really a soul yet.

Now science put us all in a panic, but the procedure is barbaric anyway.

That should never have to happen to a woman.

Your argument is valid but irrelevant as is the argument about whether life begins at conception or not. The bottom line is: It Is The Woman's Choice; NOT The Governments!!! LET IT BE!!!!

If a fertilized egg even begins to multiply its cellular mass, that can only be done when LIFE is in the cell. A dead or inanimate cell will NOT split and create another cell.

I'm pro choice, but I'd just like to point out that life has a 100% mortality rate.