Skeptics, which would you be willing to gamble on?

I do not believee in either.

I think that these are fairly equal odds. But, if I had to choose, I would say I would be more willing to gamble on the existence of ghosts. there are many places in the bible to be false. The existence of ghosts is one thing.

Although, I think now that I've thought about it for a while. I change my mind. They are far from equal odds. It is much more likely that ghosts exist than the Christian Bible being infallible. we don;t know what happens after death. And even more so, we don't know what a ghost is. Because the definition of a ghost can fit so many things, there might be some possibility of a ghost. But, now I must ask, what do you mean by Ghost? And, how infallible is infallible?

Bring on the ghosts!! That doesn't seem so plausible, but...infallible? Seriously, it was written by men over thousands of years. Last time I checked men weren't infallible.

Ghosts.

The odds of the bible being infallible is zero percent. John 14:14 proves it conclusively.

Ghosts. Although there is a lot of evidence to suggest that they do not exist, they at least do not contradict themselves the way the Bible does.

That said, when it comes down to it, I definitely wouldn't expect either bet to win.

ghosts. Infallability is nothing that exists on this planet

i would say i dont know what infallibility means,

but i recken the bible is wrong, and ghosts are cool but non existent, except for the demon that lives under my bed

They're both implausible. But infallibility of the Bible is just redonkulus and sadistic.

The Bible is real, and full of errors. Ghosts are supernatural nonsense. It's a lose/lose no matter how you look at it.

The bible, because small parts of it are historically accurate. Very small parts.

There is no evidence of ghosts whatsoever.