What makes Royal Blood Royal?

When the term started being used, probably a thousand years ago or more, there was no knowledge of "Blood typing" like Type O, B, A, AB. I don't know what type or types the royal family would have, but since they are so interrelated there would no doubt be a lot of the the same type.

"Royal Blood" just means somebody with Royalty in their family history.

A lot of people, especially from the era before they knew about DNA, would say something "was in the blood" if they meant they had inherited it through what we'd call DNA, or just was similar to their parents.

The term really does not mean anything literally, except maybe that the blood disease Hemophilia is carried by a lot of women in the royal family and transferred to their sons. Princess Diana did not carry the gene, so William and Harry do not have it.

This Site Might Help You.

RE:

What makes Royal Blood Royal?

Are they a Royal Donor or a Blood type O because by comparison I'm a Universal Donor and type O so what difference does that make. As far as I can tell makes no difference at all.

Neither. People belong to basic blood types - royals, like everyone else, can be A, B, (positive or negative) AB or O. The fact of their royal status is like their religion - it isn't genetic so it doesn't affect their blood type.

Their actual blood is no different from yours or mine.

The term "royal blood" refers to the family line.

A gorging immunity derived from banqueting on serfs is type D

It is the Dracula factor

My family line goes back to around 1012 on the English/Scot border- they were all well to do --- no special name for us leftovers -- cept American ----

Royal Blood Group

well their actual blood isnt different, its just an expression to say this person is a descendant from nobles chiefs and kings

I would tell you what it means but I don't think you guys would believe it

Because their ancestors ascend from many many many years ago and their ancestors aren't regular people there kings and queens.