Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
MC-51 AEG: Classic Army vs. G&G--which one?
Hello!
I am interested in purchasing an M41 Sar Offizier or an MC-51 FS
Which is best--the G&G FS-51, or the Classic Army SAR Offizier?
Both guns are very similar; so I just meant between the two brands, which makes the better gun.
Here's what I know:
GG:
-tightbore
-metal upper receiver
-polymer lower receiver=bad? i dunno
CA:
-all metal
-trusted brand
-cheaper
Advice? I'll post more questions as edits, if I need to, based on answers
Here's the G&G:
http://www.airsoftgi.com/product_info.php?cPath=13...
A GG catolog I have states that the lower receiver is made of polymer; though, it may have changed, as it is the 2007 product list.
Here's the CA-I would get it from AEX, though, as it is cheaper there:
3 Answers
- DmitriLv 71 decade agoFavorite Answer
G&G is, overall, far better than CA. I would like to bring to attention that the internals of a stock Echo 1 G36C are far, far more reliable than that of CA's.
If the G&G is full metal, and has a polymer lower receiver, you can count on it being the same polymer used for the real steel. The CA likely has an ABS lower.
Care to link us to the rifle's you're looking at? ASGI doesn't have the G&G listed as having a non-metal lower, but, if I'm not mistaken, the actual M41 has a metal one.
EDIT: Yeah, polymer lower, but it will stand up just fine.
- Semper FiLv 61 decade ago
Your going to have far superior craftsmanship with a G&G also... all the small things Chinese-made clones overlook (Yes CA is a Chinese clone, G&G is from Taiwan)
G&G has made a 360 with their internals (a few years back... their internals were faulty, at best), I now put them up in line, or close second to TM.
The ONLY thing I suggest replacing, if you decide to go with the G&G, is the wiring... G&G wiring seems to have high-flow, which means a shorter battery life...
Buy a set of low-resistance... & you will double your *gun's* life, & you will get quite a bit more out of your battery.
http://www.airsoftgi.com/advanced_search_result.ph...
Be sure to get the proper wiring (front -back) & for your model...
Don't quote me on it... but i beleieve yours will accept MP5 wiring & will be wired to the front (as you have a skeleton stock).
(check with the experts @ ASGI (the link)
- ?Lv 45 years ago
Defiantly KWA mate, as they make techniques-blowing airsoft game line inner and exterior. classic military in my adventure are a plenty decrease build high quality, yet they are going to do the interest on the day. additionally if this swings it over to KWA in any way, the decrease receiver and the best receiver on a KWA M4 detach with a pin (like on the actual scouse borrow weapon), which makes maintenance plenty extra handy in assessment to the classic military. as for for FPS i might say that on the two classic military and KWA are around 340 - 370, yet FPS isn't that important because it easily relies upon on the build high quality and inner areas, KWA deferentially does . Any of those 2 AEG's will carry their bring about a skirmish. yet whilst it replaced into me i might pass with the KWA. wish I helped you're making your decision.
