is Kurt warner HOF QB or good QB that played with HOF WR's?

Warner is an interesting debate. his stats are hurt by the 5 years he took off in the mifddle of his career where he was in a bad situtation with the giants and under dennis green when he first got to AZ and was supposed to be the stable pony for leinart.

based solely on stats i think warner falls short he has 5 great years and 5 terrible years.

But as much as we knock him when warner has been in the play-offs and in the big game he has delivered he owns the 3 best passing games in super bowl history.

to your question is warner a product of the talent arouind him with the rams he had holt, bruce, faulk, in AZ fitzgerald, boldin, breaston with the giants toomer, hillard, shockey, barber. it is easy to say when the players around him are better warner is better. but that can be said about all qbs

based on his superbowl performances i think warner is a borderline hall of famer. i would like to see a couple more top level seasons

He has had 3 very good seasons not 5.

He spent 3 season in the middle of his career on the bench for more than half of his teams game and in another season he spent 6 of 16 games on the bench. He is an average NFL QB who had 3 great seasons.

There is no way a player who spent 4 seasons in the middle of his career on the bench is a hall of famer

Kurt Warner got to where he is because of his play not because of his receivers. While he played for the giants, his receivers were average at best. Being in Arizona, he was blessed with upstart breakout wide receivers. He may have had help but winning 2 MVP's is a feat that he accomplished on his own.

Warner is both he is a great quarterback and I believe he has worked with some of the best receivers

He has the third highest Quarterback rating, two MVP seasons. Has led his team to three super bowls and was A super bowl MVP. Overall he is a HOF quarterback.

i disagree Kurt Warner IS a HOF QB in my book, but just my opinion

idk but hes hott.