Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Anonymous
Anonymous asked in News & EventsCurrent Events · 1 decade ago

Why is Geert Wilders refused entry into the UK, When President Bush actually invaded 2 Muslim country's....?

.....and forced a regime change on one of these country's.

Why wasn't he refused entry into the UK also. Can you even compare these action to that of Geert Wilders who has simply made a short film from news clips we have all seen over and over again........

Just how do the government choose who they let in, what criteria do they use ?

Update:

Could Pres Bush's action's not be seen as inciting Racial hatred..........

Update 2:

sorry Diss , hopefully you get the jist of what im asking .....:)

9 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    This government is the worst I can ever remember. It's odd how they can't exercise control over our borders and stop unwanted immigrants coming in, yet they can successfully ban a European politician from the UK simply because he wants to impart a truthful if uncomfortable message. Perhaps we'll regret this action when it's too late.

  • ?
    Lv 4
    5 years ago

    She slipped up on many stuff. the government and a few muslims regarded afraid by using no longer letting Geert Wilders get right of entry to into the united kingdom. final analysis is there's a edge of Islam that's no longer non violent and extremely debatable. Geert Wilders like many others had a suited to their perspectives. Lol ''Islam strictly condemns non secular extremism and using violence against harmless lives.'' humorous that, as Mohammed led quite a violent existence. Raiding the homes of Jewish people in his time.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Geert Wilders is denied entry,British people aren't allowed to bad mouth Islamic extremists for fear of prosecution,yet Islamic extremists who live here,can say what they want! Talk about hypocrisy.

    I'd like to point out,I have no problem with 'ordinary' Muslims.

  • 1 decade ago

    He is banned because he is white and European. If he was a muslim no matter how fanatical he would be allowed to enter the country probably as the guest of one of our wonderful MPs.

    He has been banned to appease the aggressive muslims who would no doubt riot at his entry. They would of course riot at the drop of a hat.

    He should be allowed to enter Britain as Holland are allies of Britain and it is time the minority haters were made to recognise that they do not decide who is welcome and who is not. As they have taken advantage of the good nature of the British it is disgusting that they now think they are in the position to determine our foreign policy.

    If we are too welcoming they could always go back to their former country.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Well Geert wilders is a racist, islamophpobic scumbag. His film is moronic and the only reason he is being invited to the UK is so that he can sit amongst like minded scum and watch the film convinced of its accuracy

    Only people who want him to come here are the people who are "sick of dose pakis movin in next door". Oh wait we cant say pakis, lets say muslims instead

    Imagine the uproar if they invited a bunch of extremist scum to the country, or an anti semetic. It's yet more hypocrisy from the lowest of the low

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Ah the warped thinking of New Labour. If he had been a left winger or a muslin no problem....but being an elected MP and a right winger who doesn't like Islam...well.!.

  • I have no evidence that Geert Wilders is a racist. I have no problem with him getting a knighthood and a couple of honorary degrees while he is in the U.K..

  • 1 decade ago

    Wondered what you were about, till your last sentence. YES--Bush is responsible for the inciting of more racial hatred than almost all.

    problem is--they (the people who DEFINE the terms) don't class it as incitement--nor even "regime change" (illegal). They called it a "hunt for WMD's". That's why Bush gets away with it, and Wilders doesn't.

    In short--it's what you SAY that gets you in trouble--not what you do.

    EDIT--Andrew S would say that. Wouldn't you, JB? Get back in your ducking stool--and STAY there. It's YOURS. Not Muslims.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Sorry, your question does not make sense. What does an anti-muslim speaker being denied access to the UK have to do with a war-mongering, pretzel eating American invading the Middle East?

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.