Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Should the 13 year old boy and the 15 year old girl have sex?
Should the 13 year old boy and the 15 year old girl have sex?
Do you think that they will be responsible for the child?
Should the social service take the child away for adoption?
I know they shouldn't be having sex during that age and it is a bit irrisponsible for that.
19 Answers
- Bernie macLv 41 decade agoFavorite Answer
The thirteen year old and fifteen year old already had sex, that's how the baby was conceived in the first place.
Should they have sex NO.
No, I do not think they are responsible enough for the baby, the dad doesn't even know what financially is.
If they are not raising the baby the correct way and neglecting it then yes they should take the baby and put it up for adoption.
They need to stop having sex or she needs to get on birth control.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
I get the feeling that the 15 year old pressured that kid into sex. I don't think that he knew what he was doing, I mean, he doesn't even know what the word 'financially' means. I don't feel like I have the right to say if someone's child should be taken away, but I DO think the child deserves some better prepared and responsible parents.
CRAZY
- AmberPLv 71 decade ago
No they shouldn't be having sex, they might end up with more kids...
They should be made to be responsible for the child at this point.. stay in school, work where they can, if they can, and so on.
No they shouldn't they should work with the families involved to make shure that ALL the children are going to be okay, and that the kids who are parents get parenting classes to know how to care properly for the child in all aspects.
You can't lay all the blame on them, why were they even allowed to date, and why didn't the parents tell them the consequences of having sex...if they didn't i do mean. If they did, then why wasn't the girl put on bc, or else they should have been supervised better so it wouldn't have happend!
- 1 decade ago
The issue we face today is a total break down of family values, we have children having children and so it goes on. Today far to many kids do not have farther figure to look up to. What is happening is wrong for the child they grow up never knowing their father a child needs a mum and a dad to have a real balanced out look on life. There are some women out there doing an amazing job of bring up a child on there own however there are far to many who have no idea about being a parent hence we start the circle yet again kids having kids.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- StinkerbellLv 41 decade ago
No, they shouldnt be having sex, we will have to wait and see if they will be responsible for the child and no, social services should NOT take the baby away! They need to be given a chance to be good parents like everyone else!
- ShannonLv 45 years ago
WTF?! are u trying 2 get pregnant or catch something? there is plenty of time 2 have sex. 15 and 13 are waaaaay 2 early! go read a book! don't make the same mistake i did. i had my 1st baby at 17 yrs old. it was one of the most traumatizing experiences i have ever had! sex can be overrated! it's not worth ruining ur life.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
I won't think they should. I know when you get to about 14, your hormones are racing as fast as a InterCity 125 & nothing can be done about that but I don't think they should have sex.
BUT how are they going to buy things from then they are still at school?
God!! No wonder this country is going downhill with prats like him at his age getting his girl up the duff. Its time this country did something about this teen pregnancy rate.
- Cornish_AngelLv 41 decade ago
Social Services will be involved with the baby now, it is their one main priority to keep families together, which i don't agree with. The boy's voice hasn't even broken yet! His parents havent even told him the birds n the bees properly, the pictures look awful, he looks too young and immature to care for the child!
- 1 decade ago
No, they shoul not. It is a very bad idea. If there is (another) baby involved, how would they provided for it? If there own parents can't take it, then yes, it should be given a chance at a great life with an adoptive family.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
1) nope thats kinda wrong. how does he even know how to have sex (he was 12 when he got preggers)
2) why not, its their kid
3)no, like i said its their kid and they want to take care of her
its not a bit irrisponsible its VERY irrisponsible.