Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Rent Question - Are we getting ripped off?

My family is considering renting a house in Pleasant Hill, CA for $2,300/month. Our prospective landlord has offered us a two-year lease at that rent and then it jumps to $2,500/month if we decide to stay beyond the two years. We love the house, but that seems like a really steep hike. This is the first time we rent a house so we don't know if this is normal or if he's ripping us off! Anyone have any experience/advice in this area? Thanks!

5 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    I don't think you would be getting ripped off. In fact, you would be lucky locking in a rate for 2 years. If in 2 years your financial situation cannot afford $2500, then move. But, be aware, rentals in 2 years may all be around the $2500 mark for what you want or even higher.

    I would take it if that is the going rate for the neighborhood and square footage.

  • 1 decade ago

    depends on the market. If rentals are a hot item in that area, you are getting a good deal considering you are locking in the original $2,300 for two years. If you sign a one year lease, I would expect the landlord to raise the rent each year $100, putting you at $2,500 after two years and having paid an extra $100 for a full year.

  • 1 decade ago

    Well if you're happy with the house for $2300 now, rent it for a couple of years. The rent hike after two years would be 8%, that's not outrageous.

  • 1 decade ago

    Well that is really a pretty fair deal. You get to know what the increase of the rents are before your term ends. It is like looking into the future, The increase is not a bad deal, Nor is a great deal. However he may be able to get more today if the economy was in better shape.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 5 years ago

    GO with a apartment. In an apt, you are not able to do something with it and in mine (that I use to reside in), they'd a prohibit on what number of image frames you cling at the wall. You are not able to paint and the partitions in a apartment are constructed extra soundproof than in an apt. Trust me I realize! :) Hope I helped, please until you are inclined for any individual else nearly controlling the way you behavior your house, I propose you pass with a apartment.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.