Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

When will Obama supporters stop using the excuse "he just got elected?"?

I've never heard an Obama supporter support their case with facts, just excuses. Case in point, Charles Barkley came to his defense while in jail for drunk driving over 2x the legal limit (which for a guy his size he had to have drank a gallon of Jack Daniels to be that high over) by calling Rush Limbaugh and anybody against Obama "jackasses" but didn't say why just that he has only been president for a couple months. Supposedly he is good friends with Obama and I can see why as they are both famous for doing nothing that has actually benefited this country. So I was wondering when people will stop using his limited time in the White House or the race card as an excuse and start to actually hold him accountable for his actions. Does anybody have any proof why his policies will work or when they will start to work? Because so far I don't see that big of a change between him and Bush except for the fact that now the government owns more banks.

Update:

since nobody seems to know how it will be before people stop using that excuse, let me ask how long will it take before people jump off the bandwagon? After 1, 4, 12 years like FDR? Only then he had the convenience of a world war to cover his poor governing. Who knows, maybe that's what Obama's planning/hoping for.

Update 2:

24: The Highest Number:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/feb/04/cb...

then go study up on the difference between FDR's New Deal and Reaganomics and tell me which one worked better and which one Obamanomics better reminds you of.

Update 3:

also, I can't believe you're using stem cell research as a pro for Obama. Kill babies all you want, but I guess democrats don't see the contradiction between Gore's global warming theory and the rest of the parties stance on abortion/stem cells, both are killing nature. And this was Barkley's words not mine. I don't know or care to know him nor Obama enough to know how good of friends they are.

Update 4:

Andrew R: IF his policies started working immediately, his detractors would be saying the same thing his supporters are saying now, that 2 months isn't enough time for his policy to make any real changes. The point I'm trying to make is that we're coming to a point where as a nation we have to decide what's more important, our liberty or our short term economy. Experts all over the world have proven that capitalism runs in cycles. Like most things in this world they need to go through a cleansing period in order to come back stronger. Right now, however, this stimulus plan is doing nothing to nurture the cleansing cycle, but everything to make Americans more dependent on the government to succeed. Maybe you know how spending billions of dollars funding foreign abortions or spending millions of dollars funding mosquito trapping techniques will help this country in the long run, because I sure don't.

18 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Tell me about it. I read in the paper that a county near where i live wanted 100 million dollars included in a requested stimulus package to build a golden statue of him! Are we serious? I get it, hes black... but he's basically gone back on every word he used during the election to get elected. Not one member of congress knew what was in the stimulus package, or cared to read it. Not loaded with pork? I think so... and before you go defending him have any of YOU even bothered reading what that money went towards! Go read it than tell me if you feel the same. ALSO, since he has been elected we have dropped 20% further into the hole.

    I just noticed someone said something about stem cells. THAT pisses me off. Obama made it legal, rather wants to make it legal to harvest stem cells from babies. DEAD ABORTED BABIES. Do you know how old a dead aborted baby has to be for the stem cells to be viable? OLD ENOUGH TO LIVE ON LIFE SUPPORT. go **** yourself.

    So yea and i totally don't want him to fail, because that's NOT what we need. I just want him to STOP being treated like he's god or something. I understand it takes time, but his rushing and packing money into businesses it doesn't belong isn't helping anyone. That's just my opinion.

  • 1 decade ago

    I know that I won't get a thumbs up, more so a best answer for my answer. but I have to concede to the fact that the politics divide in the U.S. right now is really great.

    One side wants him to succeed and another wants him to fail; both at no expense or reason at all.

    I am not an American and is therefore supposed to be neutral, which I am. From my point of view Zachs was right. He needs more time. Actually, as with any other past presidents who were judged poorly during their time, historians had been more considerate after reviewing That president's performance from a distant viewpoint.

    It is understandable for a citizen to be impatient during a crisis to demand instant cure. But even economists from all sides of the spectrum agree that for the economy to turn around requires understanding of the fundamentals of the problem, the willingness to participate in a reconstructive process to counteract the prevailing trend, and the resolve to go on with business notwithstanding the facts. And they all agree that this takes time; however, they didn't all declare how much time it requires. I tip my hat to all economists because of their bold predictions but lack of courage to give a deadline.

    The fact being that the economy, not only the U.S.'s but of the entire world, is at stake. So jump-starting the U.S. economy is not only an American expectation but also that of the entire world.

    Now, to your question when supporters will stop justifying that "he just got elected?". I think we should also consider the fact that detractors are also justifying their criticisms because of the slow results than that they were expecting.

    I am curious, if he were successful in his less than two months in office, what excuses would his detractors think of next?

    Just a thought and I'm not going for points.

    I hope that this is a legitimate intellectual exchange and not a biased questioned posed to incite readers into reacting.

  • 1 decade ago

    AMEN......You are my hero!!! You took the words right out of my mouth. I am so sick and tired of all the Obama maniacs out there that say "oh give him time, he has a lot to undo since Bush screwed up so bad". I say name ONE thing that Bush screwed up...and don't say the war with IRAQ because personally that is nothing more than standing up for the rights of our nation. If we did not send troops over there then the Taliban would have certainly succeeded in destroying this nation piece by piece and we know they can do serious damage just take a look at the footage for 9-11 incase you have forgotten.

    At the rate we are going. This nation faces a second Civil War. What is going to be left for our children after Obama has had his spending spree? How do you propose we educate the leaders of tomorrow with budget cuts in the schools today? Sure....all you Obama followers can say "give him some time" but what are you going to do when that time he has been given puts you on skid row? All this money he is giving to major corporations and banks could be used elsewhere, like in the pockets of the American People. People are losing jobs daily and Obama has already spent over $3 Trillion Dollars. Is that BUSH's fault??? NO, He was not in office when that debt was incurred and it is the largest debt incurred in history and in only a matter of 50 days!!!!! WOW!!! Now that is some change folks!!!! So lets start hearing some real facts. We're tired of all the excuses.

  • It's been about 2 months. I suppose you have a date as to when the economy would have came back around were we to do nothing. The answer? Probably a decade, maybe much longer. Obama's just offering cushioning from the federal government to make the recession hit less hard. Economics after all, measures time, and you seem to think that 2 months is enough. You also obviously haven't had that much to drink, because your judgment of Barkley's BAC is quite incorrect, and also irrelevant, sort of like your assumption that they are good friends (where'd you get that idea?) If you don't see a difference between Obama and Bush, you aren't reading enough. See: Stem Cells and Gitmo.

    Source(s): So you don't care to know either of them enough yet you are willing to say that they are good friends. Fine, whatever. I didn't use the stem cell thing as a pro, jackass, i used it as an example of a change. That's what you said "Because so far I don't see that big of a change between him and Bush except for the fact that now the government owns more banks." It's a pretty big change to me, I'm surprised it isn't to you, since apparently he's "killin babies" (not true) As for Reaganomics, that process was tried once again during Bush's term. Yeah it was very good in making rich people more rich, but doesn't seem to help any other way than that.
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Until Obama Leaves Office 1411Days

  • Zach
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    Anyone that knows a single ounce about politics knows it takes time. You can't expect the economy to be fixed in the 2 months he has been office, or a significant change. When a law is passed it still takes time for the effects of the law to take place. This is why it takes many years for things to effect the economy. Clinton started the downward spiral of the economy and he was in office more than 8 years ago. Patience is needed in politics. You will start seeing changes in time.

  • Give em about 3 and 1/2 years or so to get their bearings. Probably when all their social programs are fully funded and implemented off the backs of the taxpayer.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    You all on the right used the same argument when 9/11 occurred. You said, Bush was a newly elected president. I just love the rights hypocrisy and double standards.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I'm guessing 2126 give or take a few years.

    Come on, Obamabots don't believe it's possible for Obama to make a mistake.. so they'll never hold him accountable for what he's doing to the country.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Proof of whether or not Obama's economic proposals are working won't be available for about a year or two.

    If you want to stop hearing the "he just got elected" excuse, stop demanding instant results. He hasn't even been president for 100 days, the amount of time typically needed to judge how a president is and will perform.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.