Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentMilitary · 1 decade ago

Can someone help me understand the meaning of this?

I'm writing an essay about Guantanamo Bay. This is from an article from a very reliable database. Can you help me understand what this is saying?

"First, granting enemy combatants the same constitutional rights as U.S. citizens places an extremely high burden of proof on the United States, while affording alleged terrorists expansive discovery privileges.

**These privileges may include the right to call witnesses at trial--such as CIA agents, military personnel, and Department of Defense officials. Empowering alleged terrorists to summon these officers from the front lines to appear in court might impede our ability to prevent another attack."

**What does it mean by "the right to call witnesses at trial"? Any information would help me out tremendously. I don't think I should provide the link because it requires that I give you my school's password to the database.

Update:

ah, yeah, I was really close to posting it in Law and Ethics. this was my first stop though.

Update 2:

I understand the part about the defendant can call any witness to trial. But how would an accused terrorist use a military official as a witness? To prove that there has been torture, right? That's my next biggest question. What would they try to accomplish by bringing officials as witnesses? Please feel free to edit your answer and add this. Thanks!!!!

9 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    The defendant (or their attorney) has the right to call anyone who could have been connected to the case to testify in court.

    It is usually done in an effort by the defense to show that the law was violated when the suspect was originally detained or charged with a crime.

    To me, the argument set forth by the Bush Admin. that it would endanger witnesses or impede our ability to capture terrorists is a cop-out.

    They know that if certain witnesses are called by the defense, that it will quickly become apparent that most of the defendants were tortured to gain information about other terrorist activities and thus since torture is illegal by US law, the judge will have no choice but to set the defendant free.

  • 1 decade ago

    well the accused would be allowed to ask a witness to give his/her story in order to defend the accused this could be a friend or colleague tho witnesses could also be the arresting officer if the terrorist was caught by a soldier unit the accused can call the units commanding officer to give evidence

  • 1 decade ago

    Post this question in the Law and Ethics category and I can guarantee you'll get a much better answer hon.

    The basic answer is that you can call any witness you feel would support your case whether you are the prosecutor or the defendant.

    Source(s): US Army SSG. 82nd AB INF
  • 1 decade ago

    In an American trial, the defense gets to call witnesses. They have to have something to do with the case, but it can be anyone.

    So, an accused terrorist going to trial could call CIA agents who worked on capturing him to trial, compromising them and thier techniques (since trials are more or less public).

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    One of the fundamental principals of the American justice system is the right of the accused to confront their accuser. That is if someone alleges that you did something you have the right to have that person do it physically and in open court. What this article is saying is that it is impractical to have a front line Soldier that saw the alleged act be forced to take time out of his/her deployment to answer the summons.

  • 1 decade ago

    "the right to call witnesses at trial" is the constitutional guarantee to confront your accusors and the ability to put on a proper defense [constitutional right to fair trial].

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    i have read a bit about you

    i could mail you but you had block this

    any how now i must say sth

    i could lead you

    you like reading read this one

    Eyes Full of Tears

    The beauty of my love

    Will shine in your heart

    The love that I served

    Will ring in your nerves

    Will it fire with time?

    Love that is mine

    You will demand the same

    And will not find it again

    You will stretch

    The moments left

    The images in brain

    The beauty we gained

    Memories will be grown

    The faults that ever been

    Shall turn into stones

    Time will leave you alone

    A change in life

    People will realize

    The love that I did

    Was pure and nice

    You will see there

    The image in clear

    In a broken mirror

    Eyes full of tears

    now about religious i must say

    be Muslim its true religion

    and you must save your self from the fire

    and just keep in the mind

    we have a life after death

    where we have to ans of our deeds and action

    you must understand what i mean

    i dont know y did i say this to you

    but i liked to say you this

    if it hurts you

    sorry

    take care and bye till monday

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    dont listen to them it simply means the enemy or the opposing side may call a witness to the stand

  • 1 decade ago

    well i think if i can remember it right basically your right in a trial is that you can call on any witness you want and as many as you want

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.