Why hasn't Hannity mentioned the big stock rally?

Because he's a partisan hack whose ego doesn't allow for admitting anything good coming from the stimulus. He will remain just another conservative pundit who exists to sooth the right wingers still gnashing their teeth because the American people rejected their way of doing things. That is his sole function on Fox.

Because it makes Obama look good. But believe me, Hannity, like Rush and other conservative talk show hosts will argue why the AIG executives deserve ridiculously high bonuses.

Why is it that executives could actually run large corporations before the 1990s without gettting ridiculous levels of compensation, stock options, 10's of millions in bonuses, and outrageous golden parachute packages? Sure these pre-90s executives got well-deserved great salaries, and possibly even a percentage of their salaries as a Christmas bonus. Today why has this level of compensation gotten so excessive? Why aren't executives held accountable for their performance. The $230 million golden parachute package to a parting CEO of a large home renovation chain comes to mind as one example.

The only reason I can think about why you, Rush and others are so in favor of excessive compensation for executives is that some of these people are golfing buddies of you.

Why can't executives earn, say 30 or 50 times the average salary of the workers at their corporations. Talent doesn't always need a ridiculous compensation package.

And talent is something we haven't seen too much of in the financial corporate world these days.

Slow down, there, Ace. "Big"? I don't think so. After falling to half of where it peaked during the Bush administration, which as liberals are so quick to point out was an economic failure already, the stock market has rallied; but a "big" rally? Relatively speaking, this is a mild swelling. We are only now climbing above Clinton-era levels. I'll be "happy" when the DJIA is back above ten thousand.

Hannity will not mention anything that will look like he is supporting Obama, which is what we all should do, most of us are in some sort of financial straight as we speak, Hannity is not talking to those of you who make 100,000 or less, he figures you do not understand anyway! Get in the game people, like or not Obama was the only person worth voting for, give him a chance, it has only been 45 plus days, damn!

Your point is that Hannity and other blowhards would be touting this "rally" if it was a Republican administration. And you are probably correct. However, this "rally" is just a blip. There may be more rallies, but it by no means is an indicator of recovery by a long shot.

Hannity doesn't mention anything that conflicts with his delusional neocon propaganda.

Because sentient beings don't think of a "climb" to 52% as all that big of a "rally."

Why haven't you mentioned that recent climbs, small that they may be, have come on the heels of Obama's repudiations of his own policies?

Most likely because Fox News jumped the shark on this one

The big stock rally? When the market falls 1500, and regains 500... It's not quite time to start dancing in the street....

Hannity is a traitor of AMERICA, the one thing he touts.