Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
obama's policy on cutting subsidized loans?
I just read that obama is planning to cut the subsidies paid on loans, in order to add more money for pell grants. How come we give free money to poor people. I think that even poor people should have to take out loans to go to school just like I do. I think money should be offered to poor people, but giving it to them. I am a college student, and i work in the business office so i often see people getting paid to go to school that have a 2.0 gpa, While i have a 3.6 gpa and get nothing because my parents make to much money. I pay my way with the help of some small student loans, but i have never been given any money by the government. If the government just gives these poor students free money to attend what incentive do they have to succeed in school. Some will argue that their going to college to make themselves better, while this may be true, how come they can not pay back some student loans like i will have to one day do. It just doesn't seem fair that the gov,t will give free money to below average students. If there were some kind of standard set like maybe have a 3.0 requiremnet to get federal money then I wouldn't have as big of a problem with it, but why is the gov't wasting money on below average students. I would compare it to investing in a company that you know for a fact that tommorrow it is going under. Seems like a waste, can someone tell me if I am dead wrong and/or show a different arguement. I just think that everyone should either get free money or everyone should have to pay back debt they owe
2 Answers
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavorite Answer
It was subsidized "lawns" he cut.
- jeeper_peeper321Lv 71 decade ago
Its a sham.
While Obama might want to increase pell grants.
That's not the purpose of ending subsidized student loans.
The purpose is because he knows Banks will cut way back on issuing student loans without the subsidies.
Since the default rate on student loans is so high.
Then when more and more people cannot get loans to pay for college,
The purposely created problem, can then be fixed by government backed college education.
IE: they are purposely making loans hard to get, so they can justify the federal government stepping in and paying college tuition cost.