Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

dorothy s asked in PetsDogs · 1 decade ago

Should we review our objections to tail docking.?

I have always objected to tail docking. This week I saw evidence that in some respects has put another aspect on this.

I have never had a Spaniel; however a friend is getting a Spaniel puppy in six weeks time. The breeder remarked that she was sorry that she could not dock the puppy’s tails. I have always thought that the new rules were commendable and I was overjoyed that this breeder was observing the rules. Now I think that my views have in some respects changed

For the last two week I have observed Spaniels and their tails. They don’t just wag their tails. A happy Spaniel seems to be incapable of stopping its tail from constantly thrashing backwards and forward every minute of the day. I have a GSD and she waves her tail and lots of dogs just do this.

I met a man who was a dog handler in the prison service and his dog was wearing an Elizabethan collar and its tail was bandaged. The dog was just ten months old and it was being trained to sniff out drugs. His dog had suffered for several weeks with a bleeding tail before part of this was amputated. However the dog still had a fairly long stump and I asked the man why the vet had not had more removed and he told me that if more had been removed it could have proved fatal. (I did not understand this, can someone please explain?).

I have continued to observe how Spaniels wag their tails and I have come to the conclusion that their tails are a liability, especially with working dogs. However I suspect that other breeds were having their tails docked unnecessarily and the thought of ear cropping still appals me.

There are Boxers whose tails are still intact and I cannot see why their tails were in the past docked. I will continue observing dogs which used to have their tails routinely docked. Nevertheless for Spaniels I think that it might be beneficial for them to have their tail docked when they are a few days old, IF AND ONLY IF THE BREEDER KNOWS HOW TO DO THIS WITHOUT INFLICTING PAIN.

Update:

Willis, this sound horrendous. I have never heard of dogs being circumcised. Is this for real?

Update 2:

Karalyne. I always thought that docking was just for cosmetic reasons, now I don't know.

Update 3:

I would hate to sound patronising; however I would like to thank everyone for their intelligent and comprehensive answers. I read lots of answers and I am appalled that the majority of answerers are just looking to score points. 99% of the people who have answered my question obviously care for dogs and they do not care about points.

Just another thought, possibly a daft one. Dogs have injuries to their feet, legs, ears and bodies. We cannot remove any of the aforesaid, however IF IF IF dogs have historically had more injuries to their tails should docking for some breeds be allowed?. Thankfully GSD’s wag their tail gently and I favour GSD’s.

22 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    FYI, tail docking is done under three days of age and before the nervous system is fully functional. Neonatal puppies continue to develop their neurological functions after birth, which is also why eyes and ears don't open for another 14 days.

    At three days of age, there is very little pain and the puppies object more to being held firmly during the process than they do to the actual docking or banding. Within minutes of the procedure, the pups are back with the mother and nursing strongly with little to no vocalization at all.

    There is more pain and trauma associated with a spay surgery than tail docking in neonates!

    I would also remind people that dogs are not the only species docked and docking has never been done for cosmetic purposes. Sheep and cattle are also docked for health reasons (reduce the occurance of parasite invasion like screw worm, hygiene, etc...)

    As the owner of a docked breed, I can assure everyone that they have no problems with canine communication. They convey happiness with the wagging of a nub and their entire hind end, they have no issues with balance as proven by the unrefuted success the breed achieves in agility, SAR work and in the agile moves shown with herding stock. Watch an Aussie slide under a steer hoof as it goes in to grip that hock and tell me they have issues with balance.

  • 1 decade ago

    The original breeder of Dobermann wanted to create an intelligent, alert and physically capable guard/personal protection dog. Traditionally the tail was docked & the ears cropped to prevent injury, improve hearing & to make the breed appear more striking & intimidating.

    If the Dobermanns were to be bred, raised & trained to work, then yes, the pups should be docked & this would fall within the working dog exemption in the current UK legislation. However if someone wanted to show & work their dogs, the breeder would not be able to determine at a few days old which pups to dock.

    If a pup is professionally docked a few days after it’s whelped, it would not suffer any long terms effects from the procedure & would quickly recover when placed back with its dam & litter mates. It is the amateurs that do not know what they are doing & botch the procedure that have given the practice of docking a bad name & attracted adverse publicity.

    The current docking legislation does need to be reviewed & amended where breeds would suffer injury from not being docked.

  • 1 decade ago

    In the past I've always preferred Spaniels with a docked tail, I though it looked better and was more practically for the dog. When it came to getting my springer my mum was determined that the dog would have a tail and so I had no say in this, however I found it quite hard to find a litter of undocked springer's despite the fact it was after the docking law, because it was a working spaniel I was looking for, not show, and the majority are still docked in order to be worked. I did manage to find a puppy in the end and my little springer is almost one and so far had no problems with her tail.

    She is a HIGH energy, working stock, springer who is always wagging her tail. The only bad thing about her tail, is that because she is so clumsy she often wags it in the fire, luckily she hasn't burnt it, but we have to watch her now around the fire! Closing doors is sometimes a problem and occasionally it gets stepped on, other than that I have grown used to the tail. I actually really like it and some dogs look odd to me without them!

    When the puppy is passed a certain age, normally about 5 days, the bones have already began to form properly from the tail to the spine and so properly docking a dog past this age, can easily caise damage to the dogs spine.

    I believe that the only reason a dog should be docked is for working purposes. I think that if my spaniel was being worked in the fields her tail would probably of been injured by now. The likes of Jack Russel's benefit in being docked because the dog needs to be pulled out of rabbit holes by the top of the tail, and so the dog is docked to prevent the tail being pulled from the bottom, resulting in spinal injuries. However dogs should not be docked for looks and all breeds that once would of been docked, look much better with tails. They look very elegant. I have to say I prefer undocked dogs now. I wouldn't mind owning a docked springer, as my aunties springer was docked and it would of been a disaster if it wasn't, yet the next dog I would like to own, I have decided will be an Airedale Terrier and that, for sure, will be undocked.

    The consequences of not docking a working dog-http://www.aegisdobes.com.au/images/cdb2.jpg

    Some undocked dogs, that I believe look much better-

    http://retrieverman.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/un...

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/67...

    http://www.anti-dockingalliance.co.uk/springerwels...

    http://image02.webshots.com/2/7/92/69/80579269Zzmy...

    http://www.anti-dockingalliance.co.uk/BTerrierS-cW...

  • 1 decade ago

    When tails are docked properly, at 2-3 days old, the puppies feel little to no pain because the nerve endings are not developed. It's really more painful to remove dewclaws, but I've yet to see anyone objecting to that. There is the argument also that since good tails have not been selected for, there may be defects that have cropped up over time which would make the dog look odd or silly and the same can be said for ears which are normally cropped.

    ADD: Christina S, I accidentally gave you a td, sorry! Meant to hit the other button.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Have you actually witness a tail dock on a newborn pup? The pain is minimal if felt at all. I've seen several pups docked either by the vet or a very experienced breeder using hemostats, guess how many pups slept right through the procedure? Most. If there was any squealing it was at the faint sensation of pressure, NOT pain. the fact they were away from the warmth and smell of their mother, or being handled.

    The nervous system of a 2-3 day old pup is not fully formed. Watch a puppy when it sleeps, all that twitching is from the connections actually fully forming.

    I am all for docking as long it is done in a safe and knowledgeable manner.

    "However I suspect that other breeds were having their tails docked unnecessarily" Ever seen a herding dog that's been injured by a ticked off mother animal? That tail is a liability since it gives the animal something else to bite and/or stomp on.

    In the doberman the tail was docked to prevent people from having something large enough to pull on to prevent dog from doing its job, guarding, and causing sever harm.

  • 1 decade ago

    i have 2 yorkies, but the breeder i had purchased them from came to me already with docked tails, i personally think aesthetically looks better (this is my personal opinion and preference) but getting it docked after they are like 8 months old, i personally wouldn't, it seems like it might be too painful, something that should have been done as a young puppy.imagine a grown boy getting circumcised at age 10 or 11, seems kinda cruel.

  • 1 decade ago

    Docking of working dogs is still legal - and rightly so. The only undocked dog i have ever witnessed on a shoot nearly died after catching it on barbed wire - as a dog grows there is a large artery which develops in the tail so it lost a lot of blood.

    Docking on certain workers is a necessity but personally i see no need for it on pets.

  • It is still legal to dock the tails of working gundogs in the UK. #

    Jennifer: Herding dogs do not need their tails docked ! Border Collies atre the ultimate herding dog and never have theirs docked, why would they? When a Border Collie is herding, the tail is held low and still, there is nothing that would injure it.

    Spaniels, when hunting, rotate their tails wildly like helicoptor blades and often get them damaged in brambles and thorns with the thrashing. If they do this regularly, the tail never properly heals.

    Patient Paws: Sorry love, but I have had working Border Collies for 35 years and never seen one with a damaged tail as you describe and am LMAO at the thought of a "nippy sheep" ROFL!

    EXTRA: Poppy - for goodness sake I am from the UK where the Border Collies originated from ! Have you ever watched a true working sheepdog ? ANd I do not mean a dog shifting animals around in a small arena, I mean WORKING on rough ground in all weathers. It matters not what the terrain is, Scottish Highlands, to English lowlands, to Welsh Hills, if the dog is allowing the sheep to step on it or get behind it's butt it is either untrained or no good at its job !

    The true working sheepdog never flies it's tail over it's back and "wagging" a tail in a working sheepdog would indicate poor temperament and unsuitability as a working stock dog.

    The low carried tail is absolutely not going to get caught in long grasses or brambles I can assure you.

    The same applies to dogs that work cattle. They do sometimes get kicked and injured in the head or get broken legs, but they do not get "tails ripped off by the herd" LOL

    I have NEVER EVER seen a sheep or cow bite a dog. Sheep use their heads to butt if they get half a chance when protecting lambs, or a ram will try it on with a weak dog.

    For anyone who has not noticed, sheep are OMNIVORES, their mouth is not developed for gripping and biting, only grazing.

    The breeders and shepherds in the ISDS would be AGHAST at the thought of anyone suggesting that Border Collie tails should be docked !

    Please see the link below, there are also video clips on there.

    Notice the position and lack of movement in the tail in the 2nd link on Google vids.

  • Anonymous
    7 years ago

    So..

    There are a few real keys to dog training, whether you are trying to train your dog to come when called, sit, stop barking or any other behavior. Understanding their importance is critical to achieving rapid results that are long lasting and help develop the bond between you and your dog.

    Check this site http://www.goobypls.com/r/rd.asp?gid=572

    It's the best online dog training course available.

    Cheers.

  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    Proper training and socialization are some of your dog's most basic needs. Learn how to set a basic foundation before you begin to train your dog https://tr.im/8mL4l

    At first, dog training can seem pretty overwhelming, especially if this is your first dog. Truth be told, training your dog is a very big project. However, if you take it step by step, you will find the task to be far less daunting.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.