Difference between taste and bias in music...?

bias: A preference or an inclination, especially one that inhibits impartial judgment.

taste:

The faculty of discerning what is aesthetically excellent or appropriate.

I guess the line is drawn where you can no longer be objective about the music or musician's excellence, because, for example, you preferred one type (to the exclusion) of the other. I don't believe you possess that bias, since as you state, you like classical music. You recognize its aesthetic value. You just prefer rock in this instance, and perhaps in many instances.

I evaluate music truthfully, yet that doesn't recommend that I must be all that purpose approximately it. If i like it - i like it. If i do no longer, i do no longer. i think of I even have the capacity to be certain no count if or no longer a band or artist is gifted - routinely, interior the common or the comosition or lyrics, etc - yet there are truthfully bands who i'm able to renowned as being gifted yet want to no longer pay attention to. Yngwie Malmsteen, Megadeath, extremely Prince, and an outstanding sort of Led Zeppelin are examples of bands that i understand are gifted yet do in basic terms no longer do it for me most of the time. good question! Saul

I think it would still come under you personal taste. A bias is more like when you lean toward a particular thing because maybe you know the person involved in one side of it. A personal interest or emotional attachment to one side makes you lean toward that side.

if you like the song because it sounds good... and everything like that. then it is taste.

if you like the song just because it is rock, then it is being bias.

i hope this helps ya

Drink more beer and it will become clear to you.