Why have we heard so little about this from the main stream media?

Who would have thought 30 years ago that crimes such as these would be winked at; at the expense of being "politically correct".

Back then, homosexuals were considered PERVERTS, but now they are a group which is allowed freedom from prosecution because of their sexual preference... even at the expense of destroying the innocence of a little child; and doing him extensive harm, physically and mentally.

This is exactly what happens when SIN

is allowed to run rampant in society.

"God gave them over to a REPROBATE MIND, to do those things which are not convenient"

"Who knowing the judgment of God, that THEY WHICH COMMIT SUCH THINGS ARE WORTHY OF DEATH,

not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them."

-Romans 1:28,32

"Righteousness exalts a nation: but

SIN IS A REPROACH TO ANY PEOPLE."

-Proverbs 14:34

Mike Adams provides the only plausible answer in his peroration:

"The Associate Press (AP) did not mention the fact that the five-year old offered up for molestation was black. Bringing that fact to light might be damaging to the political coalition that exists between blacks and gays. Nor did the AP mention that the adopted child is being raised by a homosexual couple. Bringing that fact to light might harm the gay adoption movement."

Cheers,

Bruce

Wow. That's just got way too many anti-PC facets that the media is probably scared to touch it. I mean, the guy is gay, he's raping children, and they're all black kids too. Yikes on toast.

For the sake of the kids it's probably just as well that they aren't made the center of a media firestorm. They have enough to deal with, what with their despicable adoptive "father" and his perversions.

It would not be politically correct to attack a gay man for...well, acting gay. I once stumbled across a gay-oriented website and was stunned to see that a fair percentage of gays fantasize about sodomizing underage boys!

Did you know Billy Mays died?