Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Monogamy, Polygamy, Polyandry, Group marriage when colonizing another planet?
Polygamy=one husband multiple wives
polyandry=one wife multiple husbands
group marriage= multiple husbands and wives in one family
I asked this question yesterday, but now I would like to know your opinions on this if we were to colonize another planet.
My opinion is that a group marriage would be the best bet for the survival of the family, because it allows for the family to continue to care for the children if one or more of the parents are lost do to death. Buy extension this will better allow for the survival of the colony because it will give a small group a much more diverse gene pool to begin with.
Please don't think you have to agree with me on this to be picked as best answer. I want your honest opinion. I did pick an answer that I didn't agree with me when I asked this question yesterday.
I wasn't really asking which would work best to populate another planet fast. Was wondering which would best allow for the survival of the colony.
4 Answers
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
I think I'm swaying more towards polygamy.
With polyandry, only one female at a time could be pregnant in each family.
With a group marriage, which originally sounded good to me, I believe emotions would interfere and the plan would not work out. The men and women may eventually start to favor one person or group together as individual couples or small groups of three, maybe four.
With polygamy, all the women would be at the foot of this one man. They would not be able to choose, it would just be important for them to hurry up and populate. Choice always gets in the way.
I feel like I should probably mention that I definitely do not agree with any of the three of these, and I think the best way to populate a planet would be sending several different fertile couples to this planet with the mission of population. It would be the same concept as a group marriage, only the people would already have their partners. Of course, I can't see why we would have the need to populate a planet quickly, but I'm guessing you're just curious. Very interesting question, indeed!
- 1 decade ago
Any society with the resources to colonize space would be sufficiently advanced to be easily able to care for the most vulnerable members of its society.
Polygamy is a last resort for completely dysfunctional communities.
When in one community some sisters are in monogamy and some in polygamy, the ones in monogamy produce more children.
Polygamy only produces more kids for the one top guy, not for the community. Since this group would have been specifically selected for good genes, there is no reason to produce fewer kids for all the other men.
The arguments used here reflect a deep misunderstanding of how marriage works in a society.
- who WAS #1?Lv 71 decade ago
Oh My God, they would be COMMUNISTS !!! :-)
If we have the tech to colonize, we can send a huge gene pool in an ice chest. So the deciding factor would be social not genetic.
Group marriage may work, but have there been any examples in history of it working? I never heard of any.
Polyandry never works because the men would kill each other off and the woman will be naturally attracted to the stronger, so it ends up monogamy, which seems to be the natural state of humans.
- Lux Et VeritasLv 41 decade ago
I guess that would depend of what kind of people go to populate that planet, cause they will bring their religion and ideas with them, in a desperate case where humans would be desperate to populate a planet fast I think Polygamy should be the best choice.