Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Why are healthcare foes using Nazi playbook to disrupt meetings?

Exact same techniques used by Nazi, Fascist and Stalinist thugs to disrupt meetings of their opponents. Next step: uniformed storm troopers?

12 Answers

Relevance
  • ?
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Yup. And insurance companies are spening over 1.4 million dollars a day to send people to those meetings and instigate the disruptions.

  • 1 decade ago

    I think the best way to use the Nazi playbook to disrupt a meeting is just to yell out, "Check this out, I got a copy of the Nazi playbook right here!". People would be like healthcare schmealthcare...gimme a look at that playbook!

    I sure wish Hitler would have just stuck to the "Yell at their meetings" play. I know it wasn't going to lead to him ruling the world anytime soon, but sometimes if you get good at the small plays you can still win the game. Let's face it...his other plays didn't exactly work out that great!

    Oh and, the NEXT step is actually un-uniformed regular troopers. Then later on they get uniforms and then finally they start "storming".

  • 1 decade ago

    maybe because healthcare / bigger government in germany ended up putting hilter as leader. He didn't get voted in on monday and start killing jews on tuesday. It took awhile and a very slow progression of gaining more and more power. Hilter got all his power "legally" through his government, much like how congress gives the president to start wars. It is "legal" but not right.

    Explain this though, if effiency comes from being forced to be competitive, then how is government which has no competition (they don't care if they lose money) going to be effient in anyway? If it is not as effient, then how will it be cheaper?

    Here is what they are doing, they are trying to pass these laws to hide how much they are taking from you. Look at your taxes, go ahead open them up. Look at how much you paid the government over the years. Go ahead, i know you wont.

    But to give you an idea, 50k a year is 12k to the federal government and in oregon was 2.5k to them. so just shy of 15k a year i pay the government. Which is how much the average american makes. So that means for every two people, they could almost hire someone else.

    This is what you call efficent and good use of money?

    Tell me this last question. Lets say they try to do this healthcare thing, and it fails horribly. Do you think that the congressman will go home and go, "oh man did i mess up, i'm going to have to take a pay cut in order to make up to the american people"?

    Source(s): congress has ZERO vested interest in your money. They get it reguardless and spend it like they just won the lottery.
  • Lee B
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    Umm... it's okay for one side to dissent, but not the other? Quid pro quo, the Nazi SOCIALIST party was invested in socialized health care. Under the Nazi regime, one's health was not a private matter. Under any proposed national health care in this country, your health will not be a private matter. You do not know what you are talking about.

    By the by, the "playbook" you are alluding to could more correctly by attributed to Saul Alinsky.. a big hero to BHO and his ilk. Take off the blinders.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I would say that the white house snitch line is more suited to be compared to nazis and commies than real Americans exercising their right to free speech and your storm troopers may become a reality with the so called civilian defense force that Obama is proposing...so who is the real bad people here?

    put some thought into it instead of blindly following the liberal viewpoint

  • 1 decade ago

    Why are liberals once again stretching the constitution into an area that it obviously was never intended to go? People are frustrated over this and will react to the level necessary to have their voices heard. Most of these meetings have been civil, for the most part, which is to be expected. The closer we get to passing this legislation, the greater the passions will be from those that do not believe the government has this authority.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    You are describing Obama's Thugs.

    It is Senior Citizens that are fighting against Obama's Nazis, Fascists, and Communist Union Thugs.

    (I should know. I've been a Union Member since 1963.)

    You should get a job, exercise, and lose some weight.

  • 1 decade ago

    We leave that to Obama asking for people to report their neighbors if they oppose him....the Nazi's were SOCIALISTS just like your messiah...then again your messiah and Hitler have MANY things in common

    Both born outside the country they came to rule

    Both Racists

    Both ran on a platform of Hope and Change

    Both used tactics like your stating the GOP is supposedly using...(we arent) We just DARE to ask questions and have FACTS to back them up and DEMAND answers

    Both started off with high popularity and it fell FAST

    Both told people it was their duty to report their neighbors if they disagreeed with the him

    Sounds like two peas in a pod...slightly different...but of the same ideals

    Source(s): Ps for the uninformed and ignorant...yelling a speaker down is DIRECTLY from the DEMOCRATS play book...they have been doing it for YEARS....funny how when it is done to them they seek censorship...but when they do it they say Free speech....Liberal=Hypocrite
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Healthcare foes aren't using playbooks - they simply read their history and don't want what happened in socialist European states to happen here. So they speak up. And the leftist, socialist media plays them up like angry mobs. All they did was voice their opinions. I thought that's what this country was about. When was it made a crime to speak up?

  • 1 decade ago

    eazy because they and the nazis share a lot of common traits including the fact that minority rule of the few is good, and that govt is best run for the benefit of the elite rich and big business by a precious few who understand things better than the typical citizen.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.