Initially added to wrong category..muslim arab treatment question!?

There haven't been any official changes in policy, such a change wouldn't pass Constitutional muster. What happened was that people simply began ignoring the Constitution in their treatment of targeted groups because they knew that no one would say anything. This being the case you might be better off trying various American-Muslim sites and see if any of them have lists of specific anit-Muslim actions that have occurred repeatedly, those could be used to demonstrate a change in attitude and behavior that might as well be changes in policy.

to respond to your question first: confident, I do think of he's incorrect. Had he purely noted as out for stronger anti terrorist operations by way of the Israel protection Forces then i might have not have been given any objections. yet subsequently he went previous that. And now for you: might I fantastically advise you provide up being misleading with reference to the subject? I examine the item you suitable to. He reported (direct quote): "remarkable the toddlers of the terrorist who accomplished the attack interior the Mercaz Harav yeshiva from a tree." He did not say what you reported. He did not say all Arab toddlers, he reported the toddlers of a particular terrorist. Granted, this is additionally incorrect (for the reason that his toddlers have not accomplished any terrorist assaults and that i'm not even particular he had young toddlers) yet you're nonetheless misquoting. I evaluate this misleading for the reason which you're truthfully attempting to make him sound plenty worse. additionally, the JDL is a tiny corporation that has little impression on something. and ultimately, he seems to have been roundly condemned by way of companies alongside with "Musawa midsection for Arab Rights in Israel". i think that's going to be an prolonged time coming whilst they're going to truthfully condemn some distance worse statements coming from Islamic leaders in Gaza.