Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Should the Yahoo Answers Team ask political questions?

Let me phrase it this way: Do you think the Yahoo Answers Team (YAT) should reframe from posting questions or answers on Y!A that have nothing to do with Y!A policy, use, products or services?

Here is an example of a recent YAT question: What do you think are the reasons for which the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Barack Obama?

Click link: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Au95E...

[Note: I did post a response to the question* above.]

Yahoo as a Corporate entity and/or Yahoo Corporate Leadership is entitled to a political view point, as are we its members. In fact, Yahoo the business has virtually unlimited venues to do, if it so chooses. However, in my opinion, the YAT does not, and should not be allowed to put forward their own political view point or agenda. Even if discussed in the form of a question or answer. To do so, is nothing more than an abuse of power.

You and I, THE INDIVIDUAL COMMUNITY MEMBERS OF Y!A, look to YAT as quasi-speech-content-police, a non-bias, neutral, independent monitor of Y!A member activities. In other words, to ensure members abide by certain standards and practices deemed by all membership as acceptable, we trust the YAT to monitor and enforce. When YAT enters the arena as asker, especially as an asker of a political question, one as obviously controversial as the example given above, it now takes on the veil of a member.

Borrowing from the FOX IN THE HEN HOUSE analogy; YAT has all the power and authority to delete member’s questions or answers, and when they step into the shoes of a member, they do so ABSENT an overseer.

Who is policing YAT?

Let me give you the answer: WE ARE! We, the members, the users of Y!A, are the overseers of the YAT. This is not a political question I am asking, I don’t care if the YAT staff wear Obama underwear and have decorated their cubicles with Obama artwork. I’m making president here, this is about a Yahoo policy violation that has not previously been publicly address.

THIS IS THE QUESTION: Do you think YAT should ask questions (or give answers) outside of the arena of matters dealing with Yahoo products, services or policies?

Here are the Yahoo Answer Community Guidelines: http://answers.yahoo.com/info/community_guidelines

Here are the Yahoo! Terms of Service:

http://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/utos-173...

If you haven’t read them, read them.

I’m talking about a business principal called “best practices.” In my opinion, it is not wise for YAT to ask questions or answer questions outside of the scope of practice. To do so is to exploit the Y!A community.

What do you think?

Addendum: Taken from a recent memo of the Obama administration, “nor the appearance of impropriety.” I am suggesting YAT adopt this policy. No, I am not worried YAT will pull this question (this question presents no violation of Y!A). Furthermore, I trust YAT understands my concern. Whether it agrees, or not is yet to be seen. Nor is this a question about Obama or the Nobel Peace Prize (see below). I am suggesting YAT pull the question from Y!A, until Yahoo Corporate Leadership, and shareholders have time to consider the matter. I hope YAT will carefully consider my perspective in the matter, and adopt a best practice which refrains from an appearance of impropriety.

All Nobel Peace Prize Laureates:

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates...

TAP

*Abuse: Yes, I considered clicking the "abuse" button under the question at issue. But, who would enforce it?

That's right, the Asker of the question is the enforcer.

Now, you see the problem.

Update:

Davey - That's right, the Asker of the question is the enforcer. Now, you see the problem. But does Yahoo see it?

Update 2:

Davey - That's right, the Asker of the question is the enforcer. Now, you see the problem. But does Yahoo see it?

Update 3:

Update: Yes, I agree 100% everyone has a voice, an opinion and a right to freedom of expression. And I would never suggest otherwise. You need to keep in mind, I am not biting the hand that feeds me. This is a question of best practice, ethics and fairness. A question not address previously.

Think about this: Which of you can have your question(s) posted on the opening page of My Profile? When YAT started the question, with no answers, it was a featured question on our My Profile page. How many members have had their question featured on every My Profile page, absent high reader interest?

Note: As of today, I'm still waiting for YAT's answer to this question.

Update 4:

grey - Yes!

"To be the center of peoples online lives." That is the Yahoo official corporate vision statement.

Carol Bartz, YahooChief Executive Officer and the Board of Directors. needs to step into this discussion with great concern for the direction the YAT employees are moving.

I am not fighting corporate Yahoo; I am fighting a contradiction of Yahoo Code of Ethics.

Update 5:

Note: As of today, 10/13/09, I'm still waiting for YAT's answer to this question

7 Answers

Relevance
  • ?
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    I really don't see how asking a question with no bias in it makes the Y!A staff biased. They question asked a legitimate question about a recent current event regarding one of the most important men in the world (and I don't even support him and I can say that!). Besides, they wanted the opinions of the users of their site, and they did not state how they felt in one way or another. Additionally, they did not violate the community guidelines or the terms. I really do not understand why you have such a problem with a legitimate, non-biased question.

    And yes, their staff are free to ask questions in a non-biased and respectful manner. The question has seen more than 2000 responses, which compared to any other question on here, is amazing. I support them and asking a question.

    EDIT & ADDITION: They don't have to police themselves. If problems arise, either leave or go to higher ups in Yahoo! I guess what I am saying is if a non-biased question about a recent current event irks you, then leave or send a complaint to Yahoo!

  • 1 decade ago

    I think it is a free country to state your opinion. I don't see how YAT has encroached on anyone's opinion. They certainly gave you your share of space. I don't see any problem with asking questions. It isn't the question to be concerned with. It is the answer. Questions give one a barometer to sample their intellectual environment.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    My understanding is that if any two members report a question it gets deleted. In that case, we really can moderate the moderators. The only problem might be them taking it personally, and perhaps deleting the reporters accounts.

  • 1 decade ago

    Good luck fighting the battle with those corporate scumbags. You know who's asking the questions and who's answering them... the same people. Don't let it get to you, yeah it's annoying but at this point that's all it is... an annoyance. They know they've lost, so lettem b*tch to each other. You know they'll use whatever form of media they can but they know it's to late. They are a dying breed and our minds are clear and clean. Have pity on them...as you would any dying manimal.

    p.s. , I said "pity" , don't try to save them

    Source(s): One Mind Revolution
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    Did I originally miss it? Yes I did, as I wasn't online when it was posted. I see nothing wrong with the question.

  • 1 decade ago

    Anyone can post a question, so there is no real reason why a mod shouldn't do it. The moral hazard is using moderator powers to censor political opinions, which they can do regardless of whether they can post questions.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Why, don't you want to learn what people really think about

    your president and congress? We have a stake in it as much as the politicians do and if Yahoo Answers wants to put a stop to us using it this way we can Google and read their ads...whatever!

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.