Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Man fired for wearing a button! What is your take on this?
I can see firing someone for violating the dress code if they were talked to and refused to conform- so long as the standards were fairly enforced across the board.... however, this employee wore the button in question for over a year, and without warning was fired for the button.
http://www.tcpalm.com/news/2009/oct/27/fired-home-...
He was targetted for his religious beliefs. If he was a Muslim, the left would be up in arms... will they support him because he's a Christian, or will their double standard once again be evident as they persecute and ridicule him?
Oh, I agree- fire someone for violating the dress code, but provide a warning- and equally enforce the standards on EVERYONE else who was violating it too- because there were multiple people who were not in compliance. Wouldn't that be the "fair" thing to do? Otherwise they're not treating their people equitably and he has a discrimination case.
Again, he was singled out for the Christian nature of his button, since none of the other violators were fired for their violations. I don't see where he refused to take it off or where he was counseled about it.
Ok, thanks- 3rd paragraph he refused. That wasn't the brightest thing to do- but ok, let's still look at the standards- perhaps he was making a stand because they were not being fairly enforced. ie- "why should I take off my button if nobody else has to?"
9 Answers
- No MoreLv 71 decade agoFavorite Answer
I'm going with this....
Fishel says Home Depot has a “proud history” of supporting the military, and that it sanctions several of its own buttons for employees to wear, including one that reads: “United We Stand.”
Basically.. it comes down to... people can wear buttons, but not religious ones? God could be considered offensive to some workers or customers?
People can sugar coat it any way they want. Other employees were wearing buttons too. God is becoming offensive to many and being taken out of too many things. I wouldn't take that button off either. Standing up for what he believes in is what it's all about.
If you don't stand up for what you believe in, what have you got left?
- goodluckwithhatLv 71 decade ago
He shouldn't have been fired right off the bat, especially since he was wearing it for over a year. There should have been at least one if not two official "talkings to" and he should have been fired only if he refused to comply. I think the manager was trying to save his butt because he should have told him he couldn't wear it from the beginning.
He wasn't targeted for his religious beliefs. He was targeted because he violated his uniform code with which he agreed to when he signed up. Granted, he shouldn't have been fired, but he violated his dress code and had been for some time. The left might be up in arms if he were a Muslim, but that wouldn't change anything or get his job back. If you agree to wear a uniform or agree to some sort of specific dress code, you should abide by it.
- Patrick BLv 71 decade ago
He was out of uniform, they pointed it out and he refused to change, so they fired him, where's the problem?
He was in the wrong. I support both his statement and his grit for not backing down, but Home Depot has a policy for dress code and he was violating it. They have every right to fire him.
He's pushing the religious angle hoping to win money out of the case. Not very christian of him is it?
Source(s): His lawyer says other people were waring buttons, but shows no proof. His button isn't religious, it's taken from the Pledge of Alleigence. You can't prove that he was singled out at all, let alone for his religious choices. 3rd paragraph says he refused to remove it. They don't need to give warnings, especially if he refuses to do what he's told at work. It could have been a simple thing. The local manager might not have had a problem with anyone wearing buttons or other things, but a corporate stooge could have come down and told the manager to clean up his store. Since this guy always wears a button, the manager told him to take it off, it's not allowed, the guy refused, so they fire him. - 5 years ago
He wasn't fired wearing a button that was patriotic. He was fired for wearing a button that was religious. Do I think he should have been fired? No. But I don't think the words "Under God" should appear in the pledge either. The original pledge did not contain the words "Under God" and they were inserted there against the will of the Francis Bellamy estate.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- RobLv 41 decade ago
The one thing you can always count on the media for is to get the details of this type of story wrong. What you have is a former employee who is suing his former employer blabbing to the media and the employer refusing to comment due to the lawsuit. His goal is to make it sound as outrageous as possible to push them to a big settlement.
- Crown RoyalLv 71 decade ago
It doesn't matter when they asked, he refused to remove it when they did. He refused to conform to their request. That is "for cause."
If he wanted to fight it, he should have gone ahead and remove it, THEN file a discrimination suit. Because he refused, he has no case now.
- 1 decade ago
If things continue as they have been, nobody will come to the mans defense. Heres a true example: my sister-in-law was fired from a job last season for saying Merry Christmas to a customer. So what does that tell you?
- TyranusXXLv 61 decade ago
Well a private company can certainly fire someone for that if they wish. I might not agree with it but it is a private company