Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Doc Watson asked in Arts & HumanitiesPoetry · 1 decade ago

Is This New Verse Understandable Enough To The Average Reader?

This is from a long, narrative poem I'm working on. But I'm wondering if how this is being expressed will be understood enough by the average reader of poetry? So, your help please?

-

And how can we not mock

a city so foolish

as to squander a once grand and noble profession,

trading art and integrity for a third Rolls-Royce,

while convincing the world the puppet is more worthy

of our attention than the play, or the manikin

on the runway is a significant second choice?

Thank God there are a few

visionary mavericks

who eschew the celebrity dribble to address

the Wallace Beerys of the world found in all of us.

(It's from a new work in progress of mine. I may change the last two lines because many won't know who Wallace Beery was or how his name would apply today. here are two alternative lines. Which would you feel gets the message across better?)

who eschew the celebrity dribble to respect

the wonders of cinema for all the rest of us.

Update:

During the 1920s and 30s Wallace Beery was a famous actor, an Oscar winner, a homely man by today's standards who got so many leading roles because he was a hell of an actor and he represented the average man.

Update 2:

Lano, this sounds terribly pretentious? Thank you. It's supposed to sound this way because this segment of the poem is about a very pretentious mindset.

Update 3:

This stanza follows the 'second choice' line:

Though the curious tourist and the vicarious

faithful still flood the shrines it is to pay homage to

an entrenched legacy, now greatly diminished

by sanctified thievery and droll redundancy:

and the only thing paramount is the bottom line.

Update 4:

Lano, I don't feel it's pretentious. I was playing along with the well-worn catch-phrase made popular during the late 80s by pseudo-intellectuals (of which I was one for a brief time). The tone of the work, now up to fifteen stanzas, stays as is. If some see it as pretentious, so be it.

5 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    I frankly prefer the first; even though many if not most wouldn't know to whom you refer - it, simply "sounds" better, to me.

    Maybe not a good enough reason to retain it; but anyhow, that's my opinion.

    Alberich

  • 1 decade ago

    I remember Wallace Beery. Barely. My parents loved his work.

    However, people younger than their 50's will not be able to connect.

    There once was a man who would be King; but resisted. Younger people will not know of whom I speak: his name was George Washington. Sad to say, but they don't know such concepts and won't be part of the communication. Communication with the audience is always Job #1.

    The second version is probably more useful, though less sharp.

    I believe I perceive the import of your poetry. Keep up the good work.

  • 1 decade ago

    I am not a fan of poetry,

    actually I do not like it at all,

    so don't ask me what I am doing here.

    I feel if you have something to say,

    say it straight out,

    If I need to think about it

    it tires my brain

    however I do remember Wallace Beery,

    a most likable bad guy,

    a bad guy with compassion

    a bad guy with a heart

    a bad guy impossible to hate.

  • 1 decade ago

    Yes

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    Sounds terribly pretentious.

    But to write in a pretentious way about that which is pretentious is to merely include yourself as the target of your scorn.

    If you were to write about the illiterate and uneducated, you would aim not do so in an illiterate and uneducated way.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.