Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Atheists, how many of your issues start with Genesis Chapter One?

Your issues about how the creation of this world is told, and how "evolution" is some brilliant idea created by man and set aside as something so unique and special that it could not be used by some being with the power to create?

Einstein proved that, Time is relative, and Genesis clearly states the world was set up to evolve.

So, Atheists, why do you see conflict with what is stated in Genesis Chapter One?

Update:

How can anyone say there was not a beginning? Mankind has been around here... for ever?

Update 2:

Genesis One speaks about a Creator. I'm not mentioning a "god"

Update 3:

12 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    I think you completely misunderstand the big bang, abiogenesis and evolution, so Ive added links to clear up your confusion.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_bang

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution

  • 1 decade ago

    Well for starters, it states God created all animals right then. One part has him creating humans and then the rest of the animals and then in another chapter the animals and then humans.

    Man was made from dirt, and woman from the rib of the man. Evolution does not support this. Evolution proves that modern man as Adam and Eve are portrayed as did not exist in the beginning. It also proves that woman is not made from a man's rib. Evolution and the literal Genesis do not coexist. Modern man has only existed quite recently in geological time. The dirt and rib story is quite humorous, especially when people believe in it. Nearly as humorous as a virgin giving birth, and the dead rising, etc... Science shows that is not what happened. Fossils and DNA are the real evidence. The beliefs in deities are for those that do not understand science and logic and need a 2000 year old belief system to use as a crutch for life.

    Those that say Genesis is just a fictional story that God wanted to teach a lesson, I say the whole bible is a fictional story.

    Source(s): TBF
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Athesits KNOW there are no such things as gods!!

    First line - "In the begining god" why read any furhter when the first line shows a false claim?!!

    Academia states that in the absence of proof of the existence of something it must be deemed not to exist until verifiable proof is found - thus god is held not to exist pending some sort of verifiable evidence.

    There is not one single mention of Jesus in the entire Roman record - that is right - not one!!! At the same time as he was supposed to have been around there were a number of Jews claiming to be the messiah - all of whom are well recorded!!

    There is not a single contemporary record from any source and even the bible mentions of him like all other references were not written until many years after his supposed death!!

    He was supposed to have been a huge problem to the Romans and produced wonderful miracles but still not one contemporary record?

    Even the bible mentions of him like all other references were not written until many years after his supposed death!!

    Pilot is recorded in the Roman record as a somewhat lack luster man but no mention of a Jesus, a trial or crucifixion that would surely have been used to make him look brighter!!

    At best he was an amalgam of those others!!

    The Roman Emperor Constantine produced the bible and he was a pagan not god!!! He also organized Christianity into the Holly Roman Catholic Church!! Not in Israel or any of the countries of supposed origin but entirely ITALIAN!!

    Not one word of it is contemporary with the period and was not written until several hundred years after the period the story is set in!! How did the apostles write their books more than a hundred years after they would have been dead?

    What a wonder full disinformation and deception campaign he waged against his Christian enemies - so good in fact that Christians are still following the deception to this day!!!

    The first person to provide a shred of verifiable evidence for God will become world famous and mega rich!! Ain't happened yet and it never will!!

    So how does this primitive belief survive? The answer is simple and very down to Earth!!

    Acceptance of a supernatural claim tends to promote cooperative social relationships. This communication demonstrates a willingness to accept, without skepticism, the influence of the speaker in a way similar to a child's acceptance of the influence of a parent. By encouraging this kind of behavior where the most intense social relationships occur it facilitates the lack of skepticism and deters more open minded thinking.

    They are christian, Muslim or the other religions depending where they were born simply because they were indoctrinated by their parents as very young children. They will go on to indoctrinate their own children and those will go on to indoctrinate their grandchildren!!

    Atheists have the intellect to see through the conditioning and escape into the real world!!

    Agnostics have the intellect to see through the conditioning but lack the courage to throw of the conditioning entirely.

    Sadly Christians are still held firmly prisoner by the self perpetuating brainwashing!!

    Source(s): University of Missouri-Columbia. Arizona State University
  • 1 decade ago

    Einstein's relativity is irrelevant to evolution. If I'm not mistaken, Genesis says that the Earth was created and THEN the light was created, but all evidence from other solar systems shows that the stars form and light up before the planets are formed.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Because Genesis says mankind began with Adam and Eve. This directly conflicts with the Theory of Evolution and literally thousands of examples of supporting fossil evidence.

    And Einstein didn't "prove" anything, much less that time is relative. He just developed a plausible theory about the nature of time and space, and provided testable lines of evidence to support that theory.

    Maybe a more appropriate name for your avatar would be, "Kerbachard: In the Dark™".

  • Anonymous
    4 years ago

    Why do something? in the adventure that your son is satisfied, valuable, and treats his family members properly, is that not sufficient? you like intelligence too? are not you being slightly annoying? With 80% of the inhabitants in u.s. as ignorant as sin, you think of your baby would desire to be specific and above all of it? God is a stupid concept in spite of the undeniable fact that it particularly is been around conning human beings into giving the church money because of fact the initiating of the written language in one type or yet another. it particularly is the oldest and finest con sport on earth. What are you able to do? enable your son understand which you like him no count how stupid he will become. Sam Harris's e book "Letter to a Christian united states of america is very solid." acquire the P2P audio version and play it aloud for your self whilst your son happens to be around. do not do something confronting. in case you delight your self on being a loose thinking and raising a loose thinking then faith is a obtainable determination. not all human beings ought to be an atheist to be satisfied,.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I know that Genesis Chapter One is not to be taken literally. read the rest of the bible, people getting turned to salt, god is called a jealous God, people are dead one day then alive the next, scientific explanation?

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    My problem is with Creationists taking the Genesis

    account way too far (like, calling it actual history).

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    My reason for not believing is due to lack of proof (it's logical to be skeptical of the supernatural when not presented with proof), actually, not any perceived conflicts between religion and science.

  • 1 decade ago

    Talking snakes and talking donkeys belong in the fiction section.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.