Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 1 decade ago

Repubs and Dems, Is our current economic system sustainable?

This is not a rant, but is actually a factual explanation of our system. I am not judging whether it is good or bad, that is for you to decide. Please take the time to read and understand.

The Stage:

Every year, the American workers generates trillions of dollars in wealth for the corporations of this country. This wealth is called profits by our corporations. These profits are generally not shared with the people who work to create it, but are given in the form of dividends to people who own stock in the corporations. While many Americans own stock, it is only the truly wealthy who can afford to live off the dividends alone. These people, the richest 1% of the American people, who live off capital gains (dividends) do not work for the wealth that they receive, but simply receive it because they own large amounts of stock in various corporations around the world. Most of these people were inherently rich and descend from families with lots of money, or families that owned large amounts of stock in companies. Either way, most of these families children have never worked, or at least not in the sense that you and I call “work”. Meanwhile the top CEO’s make 475 times the average worker.

The Problem:

There is a culture in America to continually produce higher and higher dividends. Corporations and wall street are under enormous pressure to generate higher and higher profits so that their investors, (namely the board of directors which represents the largest shareholders) can increase their dividends and hence, their wealth. This pressure for higher and higher profits forces corporations to raise prices and slash costs. Corporations eliminate jobs, reduce benefits, freeze wages, outsource jobs and materials. Hence, consumer goods have diminished in quality, workers wages have been stagnant, and the overall quality of life for Americans has diminished greatly. Conversely, the CEO’s and the Board of Directors have used the increase in profits to increase their own dividends and overall wealth. The CEO is hired and compensated by the Board of Directors. Thus the CEO does not do what is in the best interests of the corporation or its workers, but instead does what is in the best interests of the Board of Directors (the majority stockholders) so that he/she may keep their job. We see examples of this every day. One example is American Airlines. They will lay off thousands of workers to reduce costs, and the CEO and other top executives get paid enormous bonuses, not to mention and increased dividend from better than expected profits. So, we have the pressure of corporations to increase profits, which means slashing labor costs, so that the rich can get even richer. While many of us have investments in the market via the 401K or mutual fund, the amount we receive is miniscule compared to the wealth we generate as an American worker.

The Solution:

Currently, workers do not get a portion of the profits. They get a “wage”. A wage is considered a “cost” and thus is not changed by the profits of a corporation. This wage is determined by market forces and is always the lowest possible amount that a company can pay someone to perform a given task. My solution is to restructure the corporation to let the American worker share in the profits that they create, and only what they create. For example, Comcast made 2.5 billion dollars in profit last year. This profit was divided up among its shares of outstanding Class A, Class A Preferred, and Common Stock. The majority of those 2.5 billion dollars went to the largest shareholders, which is the board of directors, most of which do not even work for Comcast. Comcast employs 80,000 people. Thus 80,000 american workers made 2.5 billion dollars in new wealth (profit) and that profit was mostly distributed to a very few lucky people who own the majority of stock. I propose that no less than half of all corporate profits go towards the workers that generated that profit. So the investors can still get their dividend, but the workers also get a fair share of the profits that they worked so hard to maintain. In my example, the average worker at Comcast would have gotten no less than 15,625 dollars as a profit sharing check at the end of the year. This would do wonders for the economy and raise the lifestyle of every American. People who work would actually benefit from their work once again.

I know that the individual investor should get a dividend from their investment in a company, but I think that the American people would be better served and have a better life if they got a share of the profits that they make. So, for starters, I would divide the profits in half. Half for the investors, and half for the workers. That would be an enormous amount of money that would go into the average American's pocket, increasing tax revenue, consumer confidence, and overall American lifestyle.

So, the question is; Is the current system sustainable?

12 Answers

Relevance
  • thomas
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    No it is not. The "Change" necessary to "right the ship" is to politically incorect, thus the ship continues a course headed right into the rocks...

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    You could have made this argument for any economy, anywhere, at any time in history.

    The reality is that the US economy is vibrant and flexible and ever-changing and adjusts and changes to the times. The adjustments are what are so painful.

    The biggest change is globalization which "adjusts" on a universal scale.

    As long as humans "produce" and do not totally destroy the earth an make it inhabitable, our economy, and everyone else's will be sustainable. But that don't mean it will always be easy.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I don't think you can or should use government force to decide wages but if more corporations started profit sharing the quality of goods and services would definitely improve along with quality of life. We need competition with these corporations but all of the government agencies and rules actually prevent competition and keep small business owners down.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Yes, the current system is sustainable.

    As to profit sharing, well, it is practiced at some companies, though more frequently at the higher levels (stock options) than at the lower ones. But I don't think it should be mandated. The fewer wrenches we throw in the market mechanism the more efficient the system is. Regulations should be aimed at insuring that markets function as markets. Consider, for example, that if half the profits went to the workers, the return on investment for the people who capitalized the company would be lower, so they'd be less likely to start and finance companies. Which would mean fewer jobs.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    NO ! our economic system is absolutely not sustainable.

    "I ... place economy among the first and most important of republican virtues, and public debt as the greatest of dangers to be feared... And to preserve (our) independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude." - Thomas Jefferson, from a letter to Governor Plumer, July 21, 1816.

    You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.

    You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.

    You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.

    You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down.

    You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.

    You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's initiative and independence.

    You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves......Abraham Lincoln

    "Depressions and mass unemployment are not caused by the free market but by government interference in the economy." -- Ludwig von Mises

    Big Brother says,take a pill and die

    http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=12857

    Source(s): My Reality
  • ?
    Lv 4
    5 years ago

    That was the Former Model, the new one is Tax and spend. Lie to the average worker about getting a tax cut. Pass legislation that causes prices on all goods and services to increase. If the government would leave the average worker alone, and stay out of our pockets, maybe we could once again earn a comfortable living. THat is really all most of us want, just to be able to pay the bills, save some for retirement and have the goddamn government stay in washington and out of our lives. Is that too much to ask? If someone decides that they want to be rich, then god bless them, the rest of us just want to be left alone. I HoPe Obama FAILS

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    the main problem with the American economic system and really every economic system is debt. Without debt, people would not have to work, and society would shut down. But that would require people being self sufficient, able to farm their own food, and cook their own food. Instead, Americans are mostly spoiled, helpless children who must work for the rest of their lives as punishment for their own stupidity.

    (that's not a rant, it's a factual representation of America).

    p.s. I like your factual rant on dividends.

  • Zinger
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    Obviously, you know little about economics, finance and other market forces. Your solution would bankrupt the company in short order. The problem of greed in America runs a whole lot deeper down the rabbit hole.

  • Adonis
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    Our economic system before the bailouts was sustainable. But if we don't allow failure, we could have a barely alive economy like that of Japan.

    We need to return to a purer form of Capitalism if our economy is to be sustainable.

  • You're 100% wrong about this not being a rant and factual.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.