Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
If the presidential candidate had to fight for each district?
Not that this could ever be financially implemented, given todays election economics. More as a theoretical idea
Would the outcome of any of the last 8 presidential elections change?
Most states are all or nothing, but let's say a candidate would have to fight for each of California's 53 districts, and only receives the ones that he won, would things be different today?
5 Answers
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavorite Answer
Probably, there are so many ways to fix this, but our crooked politicians block common sense all the time.
- Chewy Ivan 2Lv 71 decade ago
The electoral votes would more closely match the popular vote. In most elections, I don't think it will have much effect. In others, like the the 2000 presidential race, the other major candidate would probably win.
- 1 decade ago
Republicans would win most of the time. Democrats would only carry the most populated regions.
- Freedom WinsLv 51 decade ago
Liberals have Congressional Districts that don't exist. They have spent alot of money in them and they will just vote for the money since there are no people there!
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- whiteflame55Lv 61 decade ago
Maybe, but you realize that would be a total nightmare to deal with, correct? Not that your question doesn't have merit, but it's entirely unfeasible to actually attempt to implement it.
