Does Al Gore have a conflict of interest with his global warming investments?

It is not a conflict of interest because Gore is a politician and, therefore, by definition a hypocrite He is not part of the scientific community and he is not a chosen spokesperson of the science community.

He is no friend of scientists or climate science. He knows that he is not a scientist and cannot speak as an authority on scientific issues. He also knows that he is a target of the political right. Yet despite that, he did not hesitate to use science for his own gain although he had to know there would be political fallout

On the other hand, it is absolutely dishonest to blame thousands of scientists for Gore’s politics or behavior.

Where in all of the hacked emails is there something to or form Gore – or where is he even once mentioned? In fact, where are the emails, phone records, meeting logs, etc., that show Gore communicating with any scientist other than his advisors?

The bottom line is that Gore’s involvement has been an overall negative for scientists and science in general and, ultimately, for the nation because the science is real and correct (and that is true regardless of public opinion or perception).

in accordance to the Wiki web site on Gore he has right here jobs (a million) Chairman, present day television (2) Director on the board, Apple Inc (3) Unofficial consultant to Google (4) Chairman, technology investment administration (5) Chairman of the Alliance for climate secure practices (6) spouse, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers the 1st 3 have no longer something to do with carbon credit. (4) invests in companies with eco-friendly tech objectives. (5) Is make investments the three-year, $3 hundred million GW advert marketing campaign (6) Invests challenge capitol in especially information superhighway proper companies None of those companies seem to have hobbies in carbon credit, so some distance as i could desire to verify it truly is a fantasy perpetuated by employing the denier stream. If somebody has real data and not in common terms I hate Al spouting please post it. A goggle seek got here across links yet in common terms to Newsmax, Newsbusters and blogs. in spite of their names the 1st 2 are no longer information websites and don't even fake to be something yet rightwing.

All of the low-paid researchers will ultimately understand that Al Gore represents the complex overlay of politics and economics sitting atop their science. That is where the real fight is. If you want to regain the trust of the skeptical community then you must dislodge yourself from Al Gore and his shenanigans.

To say that Global Warming is a Hoax simply because Al Gore is a hypocrite and he is making money out of this is pretty much like saying that Impact Death is a Hoax because parachute companies are making money out of selling parachutes to people.

"You don't need parachutes, if you fall from a plane, you don't die, stop buying parachutes impact death is a HOAX!"

There's no logic in that.

Just because Al Gore is trying to make money doesn't make any difference to the science behind it.

Cleanse!

Gore's film was found in a British court of law to contain not one truth! and yet it brings the lie of AGW to millions all over the world!

he is a true ''captain of industry'' a liar and a thief!

If he didnt invest in clean energy the deniers would say he doesnt put his money where his mouth is.

Theyre not very bright.

Guil - that is an excellent comparison, Im going to use it. thx

Al Gore is a conflict of interest

All of the Thumbs down prove my point.