Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

sharpshooter asked in SportsWrestling · 1 decade ago

What do you guys think about this Royal Rumble Ending? HHH and HBK both winning?!?

This isn't my idea, but it was an idea that was brought up by WWE writers but they decided to cancel it. Last two competitors at the Rumble. HHH and HBK. Both guys get eliminated at the same time, therefore, they both win and get to pick a match with Sheamus and Undertaker respectiviely at Wrestlemania. Don't worry. They canceled this idea for a new one. Just asking for opinions and thought.

I honestly think its a bad idea because it kinda kills the idea of the other Rumbles where this happened. Remember the Rumble Batista won? John Cena and Batista both got eliminated but they restarted the match. If they accept these two victories, wouldn't it be cheap?

Agree or Disagree?

7 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    to "THE", Bret Hart was declared winner of that rumble. check with WWE.com on that one.

    yep, it would be cheap to have that ending, they could still play off the HBK-Taker angle even if HHH won. heck they've done that with Cena (winning his first WWE title over JBL) when he lost to Batista (Winning WHC over HHH in Mania also)

  • The
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    First user - There can so be two winners. I think it was the 1994 Rumble where Lex Luger and Bret Hart both won.

    I want to see both HHH vs Sheamus, and HBK vs Taker. I think that would have been an interesting outcome of the Rumble, though I want to see a shock win. Someone like Swagger, a guy nobody is expecting.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    there can't be two people winning at the end. Either they declare one a winner or they go to overtime like in 2005 when Batista & Cena chucked both out onto the floor.

  • ?
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    LoL, i do no longer think of they meant to music that way despite the fact that it is a advantageous twist of fate. This time the winner is in all threat going to be Christian or Jericho. wish its no longer Sheamus because of the fact Sheamus is very sparkling suited now, and it can be a threat to place him in a identify adventure at Mania. First he ought to do some good singles' suits (he had purely one Mania adventure to date). He has already gained KOTR, so i do no longer think of he desires to win the Rumble suited now to get a push. the comparable holds genuine for adult men like Wade Barrett and the Miz - none of them are going to be interior the main substantial adventure of Mania as they have not yet accomplished singles' suits there. each and all the prediction Wrestlemania playing cards that have any of those adult men in identify suits are unlikely to be genuine.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    Well two people wining the royal rumble would have been something but Yes i think that would have been pretty Cheap

    yeah i agree but i just wonder what wwe has for us next?

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I agree with absolutely everything that the user The said all the way down to the part were he said he wanted a shocker to win.

  • ?
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    i would of liked to see that

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.