Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Christian; Faith In Hearsay?
Faith In Hearsay
By WizenedSage
(This is being posted for the author, that is unavailable, with the author's permission.)
Christian, your faith is not really in god and Jesus. Your faith is really in those men who wrote those ancient texts that now comprise the Bible. Now I’m not going to ask you to believe anything without providing evidence; I wouldn’t insult your intelligence that way. But let me show you the other side of this “faith” coin.
Let me repeat my thesis; your faith is really in those men who wrote those ancient texts. This is a very important point which, I’ll wager, you have never seriously analyzed. As you well know, you learned about god and Jesus from another human who told you about them. God and Jesus did not just appear to you. Someone told you about them, and you may have learned more by reading about them in the Bible and other books. This is what our courts call hearsay evidence, which can be defined as “evidence based not on a witness' personal knowledge but on another's statement.” It’s all about what other people have said or written. There’s nothing out in the world that we can all see together or test with instruments and come to the same conclusions about (this is why there have been so many gods claimed to exist). It is vitally important that you recognize that all anyone today really “knows” about god or Jesus is based on what was written by primitive people that you never met and know almost nothing about.
Neither god nor Jesus has ever shown himself to you directly in an unambiguous way. You may have had feelings, but feelings are just emotions and the only thing emotions can prove is that you’re human. When the Muslim says he has felt the presence of Mohamed, are you convinced? Couldn’t it just be a shot of adrenaline in his brain that caused his skin to tingle and the hairs on his neck to rise? Couldn’t that explain your feelings just as well? Could the Muslim suicide bomber blow himself up if he didn’t have convincing feelings? Yet, you know for certain that the Muslim is wrong about Allah and Mohamed.
You may argue that you have a “relationship” with Jesus. But how does one have a relationship with a being who has never acknowledged your existence? Have you actually seen him? Has he talked to you or left you a phone message? Is that really a relationship? Isn’t that pretty much the same kind of “relationship” I had with Marilyn Monroe when I was a teenage boy?
All you have learned about god and Jesus comes directly or indirectly from the Bible. Now how do you know these Biblical authors were telling the truth? How could you? They wrote about things that supposedly happened thousands of years ago; things that left little or no archaeological evidence, no confirmation by unbiased contemporary historians, and there are no photos, film, or DNA. And don’t just read apologist literature to prove I’m wrong here, read the other side too. You must know that the apologists only see what they want to see and ignore the rest.
And what do you really know about these Bible writers and the quality of their testimony? Can you be sure that they weren’t just drunk or eating mushrooms, or schizophrenic, prone to epileptic visions, delusional, or simply con men seeking power and influence? Do you really know for sure? How could you?
Yes, I’ve heard the story that Jesus’ disciples were willing to die for him, so that proves he was the real thing. This is really a silly argument. Jim Jones’ followers in Guyana were so convinced he was a genuine prophet that they drank the Kool-Aid. Does this make him a prophet? History is full of examples of people willing to die for things that weren’t true.
You are perfectly aware that these authors wrote some incredibly unlikely stories about things that you wouldn’t believe if you read about them in any other book. You would not believe that knowledge of good and evil could reside in a piece of fruit if you read it in any other book. And if you think those stories weren’t meant to be taken literally, then how do you know that for sure? The Bible itself never provides a clue except on those few occasions when Jesus announces he’s going to discuss a parable. And if those other wild Bible stories are just metaphors, then how can you be sure that the Resurrection was not also meant metaphorically – or heaven and hell, for that matter? Was Jesus just a metaphor? And what about god?
Obviously, everybody will draw the fact-fiction lines in different places if the Bible is full of metaphor. How could a god actually teach the facts, the truth that way? Isn’t that why there are so many different Christian sects, because everyone makes his own determination of what’s real and what’s metaphor, and what’s important and what’s not? Why would a god leave so much up for interpretation about stuff that’s vitally important, even life and death important? Wouldn’t that be rather careless for a god? Doesn’t all this suggest pretty strongly t
9 Answers
- dka2012Lv 41 decade agoFavorite Answer
Thank you so much, this made me so happy to read. Great to know there are still some sane people out there.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
"It is vitally important that you recognize that all anyone today really “knows” about god or Jesus is based on what was written by primitive people that you never met and know almost nothing about."
The arrogance of the modern mind. Any age not possessed of twenty first century technology must have been "primitive". I doubt if people living then had average IQs any different from those of today.
"Neither god nor Jesus has ever shown himself to you directly in an unambiguous way."
Neither has Henry VIII
"All you have learned about god and Jesus comes directly or indirectly from the Bible."
Atheists want to have it both ways. One day they want to complain because not all the texts which could have been included in the Bible were included in the Bible. The next day they want to tell you that there is no textual evidence outside the Bible. Well actually the first of those two assertions is the correct one, and the Bible is not our only source of information.
"Now how do you know these Biblical authors were telling the truth? How could you?"
How do I know any ancient writer wasn't telling a pack of lies. As somebody put it, there is a level of scepticism which makes the writing of history impossible, and that is the level of scepticism which atheists, or at least the more militant amongst them, invariably bring to the Bible.
" And don’t just read apologist literature to prove I’m wrong here, read the other side too. You must know that the apologists only see what they want to see and ignore the rest."
Yes, I must admit that I have seen quite a few atheist apologists doing that.
"And what do you really know about these Bible writers and the quality of their testimony? Can you be sure that they weren’t just drunk or eating mushrooms, or schizophrenic, prone to epileptic visions, delusional, or simply con men seeking power and influence? Do you really know for sure? How could you?"
It doesn't take a genius to throw out an endless stream of unsubstantiated conjectures. Just a propagandist.
"And if those other wild Bible stories are just metaphors, then how can you be sure that the Resurrection was not also meant metaphorically – or heaven and hell, for that matter? Was Jesus just a metaphor? And what about god?"
I would advise you to read some of the scholarly literature on the subject.
- DgnosticLv 51 decade ago
What has become the Christian faith is indeed that which the Church of Rome and it's Fathers decided to include and interpret. It has little to do with the actual teachings of a man named Jesus that no one can prove historically existed. Yet these Christians are undeniably right and put their faith in whatever the early Church Fathers determined to be the truth in a circular reasoning that was built for the minds of buffoons and the uneducated. That and the point of as sword and many deaths at the hands of God's people has insured that Christianity has survived. If it was really of God would it have needed to be spread by force? That killing and arrogance they say is of the "Devil". How absurd of them. Catholic or Baptist, they share the basic scriptures and tenets that was set out by Rome and are all Roman Christianity.
- Tony_the_hereticLv 61 decade ago
I totally agree with you. The only thing you omitted is the actual absurdity of specific ideas in the Bible.
Christians would like to forget the old testament, as it is truly a savage and fantastic story which I think is more or less on par with a good Disney fantasy.
Of course, both you and I realize that when a person has a profound level of ego-involvement, rational argument doesn't work. The non-believers, like me, will agree with you. The theists will try to pick your argument apart, not willing to admit that they believe in God and the Bible for totally non-rational reasons.
And, one can hardly blame them. Who, in this imperfect world, with imperfect parents, a strong dose of absurdity , and death the end of a not always so happy story, would give up a loving God and eternal paradise for the sake of logic
For more entertainment, please click on this link. I think you will be amused
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- GnosisquestLv 61 decade ago
Thank you for sharing this good article with us; it is all true, the facts about many of these stories are also available but there is no reason to say anything for the story stands on its own.
I would just like to say to those that deny the validity of these arguments, be they Muslims or Christians, that their arguments tell us a lot about their mental activity but nothing about the validity of the thesis.
- ?Lv 45 years ago
define "divine revelations". I doubt any Christian might state that they have got not had a private adventure that has given them faith in God. whilst this may be greater of a vast definition then you definately might use, it is greater in conserving with the thought the lack of ability of such an adventure is only in step with rumour. of direction, employing such good judgment to a question assumes the willingness to somewhat think of approximately stated question. right this is my question back to you. whilst atheists usually submit assinine responses that for the period of no way instruct logical reasoning ability, and looked completely a poke at human beings of different faiths, are they actually representing atheists properly. I continuously hear how "atheists are smarter" or "atheists are greater logical". Do the solutions published bare this out, or are they jsut further info that their is little distinction between atheists and theists?
- A DRAGONLv 71 decade ago
Well, you wrote way too much but I did enjoy it.
You did, so far, smoke out 2 believers - one of them even read it all! Wow!
You outlined it very well.
That last sentence is the part that caused me to realize that the Christian god was either really dumb or completely absent.
I preferred absent. LOL
In spite of the length you did it very nicely. Thanks.
Source(s): Recovered evangelical - Atheist! - ThreeinOneLv 41 decade ago
I didn't bother reading the whole thing because, from the outset, your thesis is wrong.
"your faith is really in those men who wrote those ancient texts."
No, our faith remains in God; that He has made an effort to draw us closer to Himself.
- 1 decade ago
If I was a Christian, I would have to respond to this by saying "La la la, I can't heaaaar you!"
Source(s): Rational thought