Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Why do you think AGW deniers aren't jumping all over Bill Gates?

Update 2:

Dana - you need to update yourself on Gates' stand. While he is supporting research on geoengineering, he's very clear that we need to get to zero carbon.

Why aren't those of you who don't like the proposed economic solutions attacking those, instead of the science? Better yet - why aren't you proposing some solutions?

9 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    It's because FOX NEWS hasn't found the 'right' spin for it yet.

  • 1 decade ago

    Personally if I were a denier, I would use Gates to make the 'Superfreakonomics' argument. Gates and the authors of that book think that while global warming is a problem, the best way to solve it is through geoengineering.

    No climate scientists agree with them. However, it's a great position for AGW deniers, whose denial is based upon the fact that they vehemenly oppose carbon regulation. According to the Gates argument, we don't need to regulate carbon, because we can just manipulate the global climate through geoengineering in the future if climate change becomes too bad.

    If I were a denier I'd be jumping all over this argument. It's way better than any of the arguments they make. It's an exceptionally risky and frankly stupid position, but nevertheless it's better than denying global warming to begin with.

  • 1 decade ago

    Who's Bill Gates?

  • 1 decade ago

    Why should we?

    He has no political or scientific background to be taken seriously... he does not make any contribution to world or US policies. He has no seat in IPCC, he is just like any other person on Yahoo answers, only difference is that more people in the world could give him thumb down.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    They haven't been able to hack into his e-mail, yet?

    coldfuse,

    I guess you didn't read the entire article... Later on, the author actually clears up what Dr. Jones said and it doesn't equate to "There has been no global warming since 1995" as that isn't a quote from Dr. Jones.

    "He further admitted that in the last 15 years there had been no ‘statistically significant’ warming, although he argued this was a blip rather than the long-term trend." Again, it isn't a direct quote, but basically shows that the statement made at the beginning of the article and the headline were manipulations of what he actually said.

    _

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    He probably has some nasty tough goons for bodyguards, and they are too scared to go near him

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Bill Gates can throw his own money around at whatever silly cause strikes his fancy. What pisses me off is that GW zealots want MY money for a hypothesis based on junk science backed up with lies and distortions!

  • 1 decade ago

    Perhaps Mr. Gates has yet to read the news:

    Phil Jones: There has been no global warming since 1995

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Cl...

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    He's not that cute.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.