Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Should the government pay a ransom when people are taken hostage?

"A retired British couple snatched last year from their sailboat by pirates could be released within weeks as Somali communities inside and outside the East African country work for their freedom, a Somali official said Friday."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,588108,00.html

"Paul and Rachel Chandler were forced by pirates off their 38-foot yacht, the Lynn Rival, and onto an open skiff in October as they headed to Tanzania. Soon after, their pirate captors demanded $7 million to release the Chandlers. Britain's government refuses to pay ransoms to kidnappers."

20 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    I can't think of a better way to encourage the kidnapping of British citizens than paying a ransom.

    The government should not even consider paying a ransom.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    In fact governments all over the world do pay ransom demands, but they don;t make it public and it is not handled by politicians.

    In the UK, it is the Foreign and Commonwealth Office that handles such matters through negotiations. Senior Officers oversee all the arrangements and usually settle such matters for a fraction of the original demand. They also negotiate with war lords and others in places like Afghanistan. Even mercenary elements of the Taliban have been paid off in this way.

    Naturally, although organised criminals all over the world know this goes on, it doesn't suit them to make it common knowledge either as it would dry up the hostage industry overnight.

  • N/A
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    I much as it would be a good thing to be able to come to a quick solution we can not cooperate with terrorists.

    We should not hold back the SBS and the Royal Navy like what human rights and westminster have done in the past.

    Strike Hard Strike Sure

  • 1 decade ago

    It sets a very bad precedent. Paying a ransom will only serve to make British citizens vulnerable to ransom rooted abductions.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    Traveling into harms way should be by the choice of the tourists and taking the risks should be the responsibilities of the travelers-- this includes paying ransoms.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I feel that while we should co-operate with criminals, we shouldn't pay ransoms, because I feel that sets a precedent. Can you imagine them looking up the "cost centre code" at Horseguards:-

    "Right codes, codes, what are we looking for Expenses, nope, catering, nope, aah here it is ransoms..."

  • 1 decade ago

    Paying kidnappers encourages more kidnapping. The government would be reinforcing bad behavior.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Yes, give them the money, then shoot the evil somalian rapists in the face and take the money and the people home.

  • 1 decade ago

    No. If they do it once then they'll end up doing it all the time. It will put every UK citizen at risk when travelling overseas.

  • 1 decade ago

    Never. See countries like Colombia who have huge problems with kidnapping. Why? Because they're always paid, so it encourages more kidnappings.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.