Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
All you teabaggers out there (and anybody else of course), how do you assess Brown's impact on Obama's agenda?
After reading http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/20100413/ts_ynews/yn... do you agree? Was Brown a blessing for Democrats or is this opinion totally off base?
Edit: I meant no disrespect by using the word teabaggers, it seemed like a convenient short hand term for members of the tea party movement.
Can someone please answer the question?
8 Answers
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
The “tea Party” deserves Scott Brown he used their voter based vengeance to launch his political career. As for the loss of the Kennedy seat doesn’t matter if Scott Brown votes moderately and deviates from the Tea Party agenda. If you’d looked closer at Scott Brown beyond his truck you’d have known he wasn’t a conservative.
I’ve noticed nobody representing the Tea Party is actually saying what is evident, Scott Brown rubed the tea party. There first step toward liberating the country of the socialist agenda was going to be Scott Brown. His first major blow to Obama was the health care vote and he voted for it. The reality is Scott Brown used the populist anger to get elected and then had the sense to realize what way the culture is trending.
He voted for a democratic jobs bill disappointing the tea party people who flooded the state to get him elected. He was going to be the first foot soldier in the anti Obama insurgency but instead declined to appear at the tea party convention. He played the Tea Party presence much like Sarah Palin plays them. The difference he used their anger to get elected she uses their anger to fill her bank account.
The loss of Kennedy’s seat has only symbolic significance for the Tea Party and they hate to admit they were used.
- Anonymous5 years ago
you already know what, i in my view think of that there are human beings obtainable who only love Obama he's powerful looking and is extra truthful than Hillary, so what the rev pronounced all those loopy issues, and so what the loony bomer has had some words with Obama. that does no longer mean Obama thinks like them. Obama has on no account pronounced something like Whites and Aires. I beleinve in Obama. Hillary will make up thoughts only to get a vote. Obama is getting the votes because of the fact some how human beings beleive in him extra that Hillary, no longer because of the fact he's black. enable me remind you, he's a million/2 white too. there are a number of white human beings and HIspanics. every person is liking Obama. and a few every person is only getting scared...
- mbush40Lv 61 decade ago
If we are teabaggers, that makes you a teabaggie and make Scott Brown a Republican who took Dead Kennedy's seat...I meant Ted.
- robzuc97Lv 71 decade ago
That there is no need for the illusion of "democratic majority vote" and He can now pass His socialist redistributive agenda through "any means necessary" reconciliation (since the "Republicans did it") or simply by-pass by using federal agencies, like the FCC in the case of that uppity talk radio "vitriol". Soon, followers will be whispering in our ears "He's right, you know" and we'll be painting "CONSERVATIVE" on people's homes and places of business...
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Still not over losing Kennedy's seat to a repub are you.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Do you have a problem with politicians who are not total partisan hacks?
- Anonymous1 decade ago
WE ARE THE TEA PARTY.............YOU LIKE TEA BAGGING........