Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Should we have a system of proportional representation, based on a single transferable vote, in the UK?

Would this lead to a more representative government?

Update:

It is not just about the number of votes, in my opinion. A system where you could number parties according to preference works well in Ireland and reduces tactical voting, for a party you don't believe in.

5 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    This was, I believe, advocated by Robin Cook, who fell off his twig, like John Smith. Should one suggest they might have been pushed this is greeted with incredulous scorn; so contemptible is the propaganda environment in this country. The US uses assassination as a basic technique in the rest of the world but clearly they would never do it here.

    Big thing about single transferable vote is that you can vote for who you want without worrying that you'll 'let in the conservatives' or whoever it is that you don't want to let in.

    As you know the voter simply numbers the candidates in order of preference on the polling sheet. So:

    1 Dog lovers party

    2 Fascists in caravans

    3 Labour

    and then put nothing next to 'Conservative'.

    Should the dog lovers and the fascists not get many votes your vote is transferred to Labour and you have not risked letting in the Conservatives.

    This throws a spoke in the wheel of the US technique of giving us near identical parties to vote for, all US fronts, but making a sufficient difference that you have to vote for one to keep the other one out.

  • 1 decade ago

    TheCharl's excuses won't watch

    The party in power never wants to change the system that put it there, and can always plead more urgent business.

    For the first time, I find myself in agreement with someone whose party leaders have a track record (check them out in wikipedia) of admiring those firm, positive, decisive people who would have turned me into soap.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Yes

  • 1 decade ago

    We can't even transfer money to pay our loans. changing the system of government is such a little line on the things to do list. Maybe in a couple of years get back to this issue, it is a good idea, but not top of the list. It like a Fire Chief sorting out the clean up before he has turned on the hose to put out a fire.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    Yes. It would be a lot fairer.

    Plaid Cymru got 3 seats with just 165,394 votes

    the SNP got 6 seats with 491,386,

    yet UKIP get none with 917,832. How the hell can you call that democracy? It just isn't.

    Labour have been promising us electoral reform in 97, so don't hold your breath.

    Source(s): http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/election2010/result... (Figures correct at time of posting, 1 seat yet to be announced.)
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.