Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Why such denial of reality? Why do some pretend that "C.E." for year-designations is not a Jesus-based system?

I've experimented with this phenomenon on multiple forums, and in every case these were typical answers:

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=201005...

...in that they actually insisted that C.E. does not remain a Jesus-based system of numbering years.

Isn't it obvious that "C.E." (Common Era) year designations simply substitute for the former "A.D." designation so as to avoid mention of a title of Jesus (i.e., Lord)? Yet, I find that many will insist that the year-numbering system is NOT Jesus-based. (The fact that Western traditions most likely erred in their estimation of the year of Jesus' birth doesn't change the fact that A.D./C.E. is a Jesus-based system of year designation.)

Are deniers concerned that acceptance of the actual history of the C.E. system might prompt people to believe in the existence of an historical Jesus?

14 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Because historians have provided some pretty solid proof that Jesus wasn't even actually born 0 or 1 or whatever is was A.D. It's really not accurate to say A.D. unless you shift all your years by 5-6.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    No, no one thinks that using AD or CE will cause either a sudden conversion to or from Christianity, but it makes that system easier to use for those 4 billion other non-Christians all over the world.

    It gives some nod to a cultural system which was spread by Christians because it would be too hard to get everyone to redefine this as year 0 New Era or 432 Scientific Era or something. EVERY system we would propose would be similarly based on someone's prejudice. And anyway if we had the stomach for such change we'd redefine the length of the hour minute and second so we could get rid of those damn leap years.

  • Corey
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    Today's the last day of May, named after the Roman goddess Maia, (and a Monday, named after Mani, Norse god of the Moon). Tomorrow is the first day of June, named after Juno, Roman queen of the gods, and a Tuesday, named after Tyr, Norse god of war.

    The year reckoning from the Gregorian calendar is just a convention, it implies no religious orientation. That they invented the calendar to count the years since the supposed birth of Jesus, that doesn't make a historical Jesus any more real than Maia, Juno, Mani, or Tyr.

  • 1 decade ago

    It is because the person who invented the year dating system thought Jesus did exist. In fact they know know it to be about by at least 5 years from when he wa supposed to have existed in the first place.

    It does not prove that Jesus existed, simply it only proves that something who came along afterwards thought he did. I mean we have to number years some how do we not?

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    Jesus was one of the last "god/saviors. Osiris came well before him.

    Doesn't matter what we call the CE or AD. Christianity is nothing new, nothing unique. It's a splinter group from Jewish beliefs. It is a practical copy of the beliefs that came before it.

    Which were many, many of them and all very similar to the Jesus story.

  • ?
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    Another way to look at it is bz - before zeus became god - and az - after zeus became god.

    They will look to change times and dates - and they HAVE!!!

    xtianity brought with it a time of persecution, torture, murder, hysteria and destruction of any history that gave evidence against the church. xtianity keeps shapeshifting into new denominations and then takes no responsibility for its own history - saying those weren't real xtians.

    You shall know them by their fruit.

    Source(s): ex-xtian
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Of course it's based on Jesus. The PC just want to make everybody happy that's all.

    @Joe, a few years hear or there don't matter. The Western calendar is based on that One.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Thursday means Thor exists! January means Janus exists!

  • 1 decade ago

    it doesn't matter

    i prefer C.E.

    you prefer A.D.

    get a life

    Gods aren't historical anyways (a miracle made by a universe making god = turning water into wine for a croud? HAHA what crazy BS!)

  • 1 decade ago

    Deniers don't believe that this will prompt anyone. The people arguing with you probably just don't know what they're talking about.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.