Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Oil spill -- is it not possible to install a large enough pipeline over the mouth of the oil spill and siphon?

off the oil into tanker ships? Has anything like this been attempted so far?

Surely by now, after several disastrous oil spills round the world such a system would be kept on as a Plan B?

I really think it would be a better and easier job to siphon off the spill rather than try to stop it because stoppage could create a burst up elsewhere.

see the oil spill ticker here, its so alarming and almost 50 days gone by and threatening to get much worse!

Update 2:

agreed that it is too much to build or install mile high pipes; but is there an alternative to make use of submarine tankers?

any other ways to tackle this huge disaster?

keep on brainstorming, i say..

9 Answers

Relevance
  • Favorite Answer

    There is a good chance this is not an accident. BP and Obama are making minimal use of technology and experts. There is an agenda here that is scary. People are forbidden and arrested in Louisiana for talking to media about what is going on.

    Be afraid. Be very afraid!

  • 1 decade ago

    This large pipe would have to stand up in the Gulf and be over a mile high. Can you imagine sticking a pipe up in the air to a height 4 or 5 times the height of the Empire State Building. Pretty difficult task.

    The only way they can get a pipe down to the well is to hang it from a drilling barge. That limits how big a pipe they can use since there are weight limits on the drilling barge's lifting capacity. A large pipe probably is not within that capability.

    I know everyone wants to control the leak but there are practical limits what can be done but I can see from some of the comments here, there are lots of people who simply don't have a grasp on the problems involved and limits that exist.

    As to calling themselves engineeers, the original system is well engineered but poorly operated. Even the best system can't survive if the operators do incorrect things like not having a functioning BOP at the critical time when you are finishing a well.

  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    The oil spill is terrible. BP benefits a spanking. they don't look to be truly doing something to purpose to end the spreading that works. unfavorable seashores and fish and birds and human beings too! i imagine the reaction to the oil spill is in simple terms too sluggish. The oil hasn't stopped leaking and a good number of it really is spilling out each minute. preventing an oil spill like that is truly tricky and just about no longer plausible, yet someone could a minimum of attempt something.

  • Duffer
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    I think they already tried something similar. The trouble is that the leak is 5,000 feet down and subject not just to enormous pressure at that depth, but unpredictable currents too. Its too late now, but why wasn't the thing fitted with some sort of stop valve before installation so that in the event of pipe failure it could be turned off? Did no one think ahead and allow for the possibility, however remote, just because the thing was going to be inaccessible? And they call themselves engineers!

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    And why arn't shut off valves incorporated into the pipe at intervals. At least we would know how much was still to come.

    And, Obama mouthing hard about British Petroleum - its an international company/US regulations are pretty lax on off-shore drilling compared to Europe/some US states are very dependent for their livelihood on BP. Focus on the problem Mr Obama.

    And btw - if this pipe was natural gas (as I worked on off-shore central America) what would the consequences be in human terms ?

    Source(s): UK former pipeline engineer (many years ago).
  • 1 decade ago

    Totally agree with you...with the tremendous pressure coming from the pipe, and being down 5000 feet, It seems to make the most sense to "Fit" some type of collar around it and slowly, begin siphoning oil to stand by rigs.

  • 1 decade ago

    Err little spoke of fact, but theres 2 actual leaks...

    What im concerned about is Hurricane season... All this will get churned up onto the soil/land

    Hmm crude oil and methane.. Humans huh, were a virus with shoes.. Oil oil oil!! fuk the environment

    £££ $$$ one day we shall learn!

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    You would have thought that with todays technology they would have manufactured something like a big heavy

    bell / dome to lower down over the thing. or a big heavy concrete tower.

    Source(s): dukebawkes
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    They tried that on May 14 with "Operation Top Hat" and it didn't work.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.