Does the fact that evolutionists have different types of science terms prevent them from performing research?

Darwinists have tried to perform some research to support their odd theory that we are the mutant ancestors of bacteria that formed by spontaneous generation in a chemical pool. However, they have always come up empty.

For example, the Miller-Urey experiment created some amino acids by zapping a pool of chemicals with electricity. However, they used a reducing atmosphere completely different from the primordial earth, and amino acids are a long way from cells.

Others have tried to get evolved fruit flies by irradiating them, and they have gotten some 4-winged fruit flies. However, they can't fly, and they are not a new species.

Because they can't "evolve" any new species in the lab, Darwinists usually retreat to unfalsifiable speculations based on homologies (similarities between species). Of course, this isn't evidence of common ancestry.

Most species appeared in a biological instant, the Cambrian explosion, without any ancestors in the lower fossil strata. The few million years of their appearance doesn't begin to allow for the incremental development of complex limbs, organ systems, and body plans postulated by Darwin.

Cheers,

Bruce

What do you mean by "different types of science terms"? Really...I don't understand. Do you mean different terms for the same thing?

Attempt at being clever: Failed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkgFjudvKBI&feature...

No.

why would it?