Is it interesting that Pro-Choicers are for birth-control and abortions, yet they have already been born?

Very interesting. The liberal mind is something to marvel at.Kinda like a crocodile,interesting to look at but they have the jaws of death.

Not really. Pro-choicers aren't trying to argue that no one should ever be born. They believe the woman should have a choice and families should be able to plan and have control over their own lives.

If you make birth control and abortion illegal, you ARE exerting some form of control over someone's life. If I wasn't taking birth control, my husband and I would undoubtedly have multiple children by now, we wouldn't have gone to college, we would probably be on welfare working a low-wage job trying to scrape by and provide a quality life for our kids.

I plan to have kids in two years. I will have a well-paying job, as will my husband, and will also have a wealth of knowledge and world experience to pass down to our kids. Thank GOD for that.

Pretty Funny that your name is Libertarians Unite and you would ask a question like this. It is funny how people want to control what other people do with their bodies.

OMG this is such a stupid argument. Stop trying to control others' bodies.

Might be the worst yet for you anti-choicers.

Not as ironic as the vast majority of pro life advocates not even having a uterus.

YEAH, and all those whiny Pro 2nd amendment gun rights babies are all against getting shot.

What the heck is up with that?

Is a pro lifer against abortion because they themsleves have been aborted?

That does tend to happen that way. Have you figured out a way to involve fetuses in opinion polling?

You find it interesting that fetuses in utero are not voicing their opinions? Is it a joke?

Your friends say your are quite the wit, but i think they are only half right.