Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

What do you think of these suggestions for stabilizing World population growth ?

Access to contraception.

Family planing education.

And for it to be made law that a family is permitted only two children. With access to medical science guaranteeing them one boy one girl to maintain a gender balance in the population.

I think a wise humanity would understand the need for this.

Update:

@EIDuderino

A stupid humanity will just run on down the road to self destruction like a mob of sheep.

Parents would still have the right to not choose the sex of their children and let be what be.

it makes me laugh how you people continue to find negative labels for suggestions that are from the wisdom of Yahweh, see Yahweh's Message at rael.org :)

Update 2:

@Veritatis

Please don't put words in my mouth, Did I say it was for only one race? NO !

iI is for all citizens of the world united in wisdom, understanding, and love, who wish to find solutions to the problems that will effect the generations to come.

An overpopulated world is unsustainable, it is indeed something that will effect the health and well-being of not only future generations of humans but all life on this planet.

4 Answers

Relevance
  • Tom
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    The cost implications of supplying sex selection for every child in the world would take way too long to train all the geneticists, it would take generations and all the while the population would be shrinking while people waited around.

    Wealth and education has a direct impact on the number of kids people have. When people are wealthier and better educated, they have fewer kids. That alongside the plummetting fertility rates and the increasing population creating a larger reservoir of humans to incubate the next disease causing a global epidemic of sufficient virulence and eventual morbidity to outpace the speed of which our biomedical scientists can generate a cure (while theyre getting quicker) is increased.

    Also, the amount of arable land we have is shrinking, with most of it already producing as much food as possible. This means that essentially, soon, we will run out of land we can farm for food and the population will starve.

    If you combine epidemiology with other issues such as macroeconomics, eventually, the poor half of the world will starve and famine and disease will kill most of them off.

    Access to contraception and family planning services are a good start in countries where education just doesnt exist to the levels we enjoy. Secondly, the 1 child per family rule in China has fell flat on its ass. Just read about that and how it simply just hasnt worked.

    You wouldnt need to artifically pick 1 boy and 1 girl per family to maintain gender balance. The sperm does that all on its own. There is a 50/50 chance each baby will be a boy or girl and when you expand the number to several million babies a year, you will realise that there already is a balanced number of boys and girls born, so you wouldnt need to artificially pick the babies sex to keep the balance, making that concept redundant.

    Source(s): Biomedical Scientist
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Are you saying that you want to limit the population growth of non white people? You better take a look at this first.

    Law: Genocide

    Article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide from 1948 defines genocide as any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such:

    (a) Killing members of the group;

    (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

    (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

    (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

    (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

    You know that law applies to white people too

  • 1 decade ago

    all are in pain

    all pain is due to birth

    giving birth is bad

    extinction of all is good

    never create what will always be destroyed

    never give birth to what will always die

    jisko hamesha marna hai usko paida mat karna

    human extinction by celibacy

    no birth

    no death

    no pain

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    mmm.. eugenics and restrictions on reproductive rights.

    You've managed to combine Nazism with Maoism, congratulations.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.