Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Where is it written in our laws, the actual law, regarding separation of church/state?

I have heard of the letters. Knowing a bit of the history at the times it was more that they didn't want the state in church business not the other way around. If I am wrong, please quote the source and where I could go to confirm your assertion.

26 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Separation of church and state never appears in any of our founding documents. The only thing the founders were after was that a state religion not be established. We were founded on Judeo-Christian values and prayers were held before most assemblies. The Constitution also says freedom OF religion not freedom FROM religion. And no the Constitution doesn't say anything about God but it does refer to the ONE CREATOR. This was meant to acknowledge that we have a Creator and to establish where our rights came from. GOD not the government.

  • 1 decade ago

    The Free Exercise Clause is the accompanying clause with the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause together read:

    “ Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof... ”

    In 1878, the Supreme Court was first called to interpret the extent of the Free Exercise Clause in Reynolds v. United States, as related to the prosecution of polygamy under federal law. The Supreme Court upheld Mr. Reynolds' conviction for bigamy, deciding that to do otherwise would provide constitutional protection for a gamut of religious beliefs, including those as extreme as human sacrifice. The Court said (at page 162): "Congress cannot pass a law for the government of the Territory which shall prohibit the free exercise of religion. The first amendment to the Constitution expressly forbids such legislation." Of federal territorial laws, the Court said: "Laws are made for the government of actions, and while they cannot interfere with mere religious beliefs and opinions, they may with practices."

    Jehovah's Witnesses were often the target of such restriction. Several cases involving the Witnesses gave the Court the opportunity to rule on the application of the Free Exercise Clause. Subsequently, the Warren Court adopted an expansive view of the clause, the "compelling interest" doctrine (whereby a state must show a compelling interest in restricting religion-related activities), but later decisions have reduced the scope of this interpretation.

    In Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963), the Warren Court applied the strict scrutiny standard of review to this clause, holding that a state must demonstrate a compelling interest in restricting religious activities. In Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), the Supreme Court retreated from this standard, permitting governmental actions that were neutral regarding religion. The Congress attempted to restore this standard by passing the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, but in City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997), the Supreme Court held that such an attempt was unconstitutional regarding state and local government actions (though permissible regarding federal actions).

  • 1 decade ago

    There was a tradition of the state taking control of its major religions with the head of state being the head priest or some such thing. It happened in ancient Egypt, where the Pharaoh was considered a god in charge of everything. It happened in Japan, where the Emperor was a god in charge of everything. In England, the Queen is still considered the head of their Anglican religion. At other times throughout history, the religious leaders took control of governments. The best example for Europeans is the roman catholic pope giving orders to various European kings and emperors through the centuries. It's gone back and forth with the religious authorities alternating power and control with the civil authorities, and the result of mixing the two was always bad. That's the thought which drove the U.S. founding fathers to say in the Constitution that the Congress will not establish an official U.S. religion as did some many of the European kings and queens, e.g., Henry the VIII, Bloody Mary, James 1, Philippe of Spain, etc.

  • 1 decade ago

    It's the first amendment of the Constitution.

    "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

    The founding fathers were very aware of how religion was such a strong force in Europe, and some of the founding colonies. It could unite people against each other, and lead to a loss of strength in the region. They also knew that it had led to terrible wars within countries because the state sponsored religion was not always the one that people wanted. At the time of the start of the US, most major religions had their headquarters and leaders in Europe, and this could lead to the power of the US being controlled by a foreign power that didn't have our best interests in mind.

    I hope this helps,

    Raine

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    It is questions like this that further proves that teachers are not making history fun. It is basic grade school stuff. No offense, but you are not smarter than a 5th grader.

    The Constitution is very clear on this, in the 1st Amendment:

    http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#Am1

    Amendment 1 - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791.

    Congress SHALL MAKE NO LAW RESPECTING AN ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION, OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXORCISE THEREOF; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    That means that NO religion has either the power or right to make laws that are based in and support of ONLY their religion's beliefs or doctrine; that NO religion has the right to force their beliefs on others and NO religion has the power or right to deny anyone the same rights and freedoms that they enjoy.

    It is also the evidence that the United States has never been a "Christian" nation and has always been a SECULAR nation, respecting, by law, ALL religions.

    It also means that not only can the state not interfere with church canons (where those canons ONLY apply to church members), but the church cannot interfere in state laws or the rights of people not of that religion.

    Source(s): I payed attention in civics class, because my rights are important to me.
  • 1 decade ago

    The words "Separation of Church and State" were taken from a politicians letter to another politician.

    The original idea was to keep any religion from using the Power of the State, Law Enforcement, Courts, and the Military, to impose any one belief on the People.

  • What the First Amendment means is that the government cannot make any law either favoring or discriminating against any religion. The government is to be totally neutral in matters of religion, which means that it must keep itself separate from religion. Any religious expression by the government would counter the First Amendment.

    The Fourteenth Amendment makes those same requirements applicable to the states, which means that the First Amendment applies to state governments as well.

  • 1 decade ago

    You are right. All the First Amendment says is that the government could not make a state religion. There was one letter by Thomas Jefferson to a Baptist church(he was in Europe when the relevant documents sited were written) from which that phrase comes. You can probably find what you are looking for at wallbuilders.com and from David Barton, who has been called a national historical treasure for his encyclopedic knowledge of Christianity and U.S. history.

  • 1 decade ago

    First Amendment of the US Constitution:

    "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

    Clearly, we're talking about the first part. The government cannot establish a state religion, and cannot prohibit people from expressing their religious beliefs.

  • 1 decade ago

    The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is also the first section of the Bill of Rights. It is arguably the most important part of the U.S. Constitution, as it guarantees freedoms of religion, speech, writing and publishing, peaceful assembly, and the freedom to raise grievances with the Government. In addition, it requires that a wall of separation be maintained between church and state. It reads:

    "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

    Its origins in the Virginia bill on religious freedom:

    The roots of the First Amendment can be traced to a bill written by Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) in 1777 and proposed to the Virginia Legislature in 1779. 1It guaranteed freedom of (and from) religion. After an impassioned speech by James Madison, and after some amendments, it became law in that state on 1786-JAN-16. 2

    How the first amendment was written:

    In the spring of 1778, the Constitutional Convention was held in Philadelphia, PA. They resolved three main religious controversies. They:

    Decided that there would be no religious test, oath or other requirement for any federal elected office.

    Allowed Quakers and others to affirm (rather than swear) their oaths of office.

    Refrained from recognizing the religion of Christianity, or one of its denominations, as an established, state church.

    But there was no specific guarantee of religious freedom.

    Jefferson was pleased with the constitution, but felt it was incomplete. He pushed for legislation that would guarantee individual rights, including what he felt was the prime guarantee: freedom of and from religion. Madison promised to promote such a bill, in order to gain support for the ratification of the constitution by the State of Virginia. In 1789, the first of ten amendments were written to the constitution; they have since been known as the Bill of Rights.

    Source(s): religioustolerance.org
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.