In the NT,there are chapters other than Matthew,Mark,Luke and John.Who wrote them?R they God's words & bible?

acts was written by luke.

many of the nt letters - from romans through philemon were written by paul.

pastoral epistles (1 and 2 timothy, titus) were written by paul or pseudonymously by someone in his tradition.

hebrews is completely anonymous, though some speculate that it may have been written by paul.

james was written by james, the brother of Jesus.

1-3 john were written by john or possibly by his disciples.

jude was written by a different brother of Jesus.

revelation was written by someone named john, though there is controversy over whether it's john the apostle.

yes, they are God's words and the bible.

This is where all Christians make their biggest mistake!

They think that every word in the bible is the word of God, or was inspired by God.

They are wrong!!!

ONLY the actual words spoken by Jesus himself are the words of God.

If any words written in the bible do not start off with "Jesus Said", they are not the words Jesus spoke, they did not come from God,

This is what John 6:32 is saying, that the words spoken by Moses did not come from God.

John 10:8 is also saying that Moses and the prophets lied.

Luke 24:25 is saying the same thing as John 6:32, John 10:8, John 4:21-22, and John 3:14 is saying. They are all saying that the words Moses heard were the words of the devil,but because Moses and the prophets believed it was God they heard or seen (John 5:37) God forgave them, for all the sins they committed at the moment Jesus died on the cross.

John 12:49-50 and John 14:10 are saying saying that the words Jesus spoke where the TRUE words from heaven.

Now how do all of us understand that your assessment of the Bible is right? DSS manuscripts took us returned a techniques-a lot farther returned than 3 hundred a.d. Re-written, revised and re-translated, lacking chapters?? you do no longer understand this! you're repeating somebody who has an ax to grind. you won't be able to probably understand this any greater than an atheists can understand there's no God. yet,....studying unique languages is crucial for intense Bible pupils,as is the study of interpretation. sure, there are numerous techniques of interpretation taught. that's unlucky. in straight forward terms you will be appropriate. in simple terms by way of fact some are incorrect, does no longer mean all are incorrect. The literal, historic, grammatical approach seems to yield consistency in the process. "Context" is often king in translation, so there must be no ought to apply a be conscious out of context. Dallas Theological Seminary has a stable take care of on interpretation, as do maximum Baptists and Presbyterians faculties. The churches of Christ (no longer "united") do somewhat nicely additionally. Many pupils have long handed by way of those faculties. they could disagree alongside with your opinion.

The Trinity isn't mentioned in the Bible. I'll assume you're referring to the conspiracy theorist's favorite, Nicaea. Arianism was running around back then. That's why they called the bloodae council: to decide what they believed.

The other fellows covered the initial question pretty well.

One of the most controversial books in the NT is the book of Hebrews. NO ONE, no christian historian knows who wrote that book exactly.

They can only guess it was paul who wrote it.

There's zero evidence paul wrote it.

Nobody knows who wrote the bible and even biblical scholars admit that it is highly unlikely that the gospels were written by those men

This site was given to me last night when I asked a similar question. It is excellent.

http://freethought.mbdojo.com/canon.html